Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201945›Full record

ArticleCogent social sciences2017

The physiology of adolescent sexual behaviour: A systematic review.

Jan Pringle, Kathryn L Mills, John McAteer, Ruth Jepson, Emma Hogg, Neil Anand, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cogent social sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sexual Practices During Adolescence.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan PringleScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond St, EdinburghEH8 9DX, UK.
Kathryn L MillsDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Oregon, OR, USA.
John McAteerScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond St, EdinburghEH8 9DX, UK.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond St, EdinburghEH8 9DX, UK.
Emma HoggYouth Health, NHS Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Neil AnandNHS Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah-Jayne BlakemoreUCL, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

adolescent sexualityhormonesphysiologysexual developmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29201945
PMCPMC5692360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.