Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201935›Full record

ArticlePsychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity2017

A Review of Contemporary Assessment Tools for Use with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Adults.

Grant P Shulman, Natalie R Holt, Debra A Hope, Richard Mocarski, Joshua Eyer, Nathan Woodruff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Growth from adversity in trans and gender diverse people of color.International journal of transgender health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Systematic Review of Recommendations for Behavioral Health Services for Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults: The Three-Legged Stool of Evidence-Based Practice is Unbalanced.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grant P ShulmanUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Natalie R HoltUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Debra A HopeUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Richard MocarskiUniversity of Nebraska-Kearney.
Joshua EyerUniversity of Alabama.
Nathan WoodruffTransCollaborations Community Board.

Funding

Community Partnership to Identify Intervention Targets to Improve Mental Health Services to Transgender Individuals in Underserved AreasR21MH108897 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HOPE, DEBRA A. · 2016 to 2017
$399k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH108897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of the need for culturally sensitive services for individuals who identify as transgender or gender non-conforming (TGNC), and only recently have empirical studies appeared in the literature that inform best practices for TGNC people. Competent, culturally appropriate clinical services and research depend upon methodologically sound assessment of key constructs, but it is unclear whether appropriate self-report or clinician-rated assessment tools for adults exist. This paper reviewed existing published measures to identify areas of strength as well as existing gaps in the available research. The search strategy for this systematic review identified any published paper describing a self-report or clinician-rated scale for assessing transgender-related concerns. Each measure was reviewed for information on its scope, reliability, validity, strengths, limitations, and source. The majority of these questionnaires were developed with the TGNC communities and targeted important factors that affect quality of life for TGNC people. Limitations included limited evidence for validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. Overall, the field is moving in the direction of TGNC-affirming assessment, and promising measures have been created to monitor important aspects of quality of life for TGNC people. Future research should continue to validate these measures for use in assessing clinical outcomes and the monitoring of treatment progress.

Indexed as

assessmentgender non-conformingself-report measurestransgender

Identifiers

PMID29201935
PMCPMC5703434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.