Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201600›Full record

ReviewCurrent transplantation reports2017

Donation, Not Disease! A Multiple-Hit Hypothesis on Development of Post-Donation Kidney Disease.

Xingxing S Cheng, Richard J Glassock, Krista L Lentine, Glenn M Chertow, Jane C Tan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current transplantation reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingxing S ChengDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Suite 200, Mail code 5785, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
Richard J GlassockDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Krista L LentineDivision of Nephrology, Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis, MO USA.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Suite 200, Mail code 5785, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
Jane C TanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Suite 200, Mail code 5785, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe risks following living kidney donation has been the subject of rigorous investigation in the past several decades. How to utilize the burgeoning new knowledge base to better the risk assessment, education, and health maintenance of donors is unclear. We review the physiologic and epidemiologic evidences on the post-donation state and submit a multiple-hit hypothesis to reconcile the finite elevation in risk of kidney disease after donation with the benign course of most kidney donors. RECENT

findingsThe risk of end-stage kidney disease is higher in kidney donors compared to similarly healthy non-kidney donors. Nonetheless, post-donation kidney disease is uncommon and arises mostly in the setting of other "hits"-either a "first hit" present at birth or a "second hit" acquired later in life. SUMMARY: The transplant community's focus should be directed toward (1) personalized risk assessment to inform consent before donation and (2) preventing and treating development of "second hits" following kidney donation.

Indexed as

Living kidney donationPost-donation kidney diseaseRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID29201600
PMCPMC5691123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.