Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201588›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2017

Reminders make people adhere better to a self-help sleep intervention.

Corine Horsch, Sandor Spruit, Jaap Lancee, Rogier van Eijk, Robbert Jan Beun, Mark Neerincx, Willem-Paul Brinkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Reinforcing sleep education with behavioral change strategies: intervention effects on sleep timing, sleep duration, and academic performance.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  6. Advancing adolescent bedtime by motivational interviewing and text message: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corine HorschDelft University of Technolgoy, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Sandor SpruitUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jaap LanceeUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rogier van EijkUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robbert Jan BeunUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark NeerincxDelft University of Technolgoy, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Willem-Paul BrinkmanDelft University of Technolgoy, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experiment presented in this paper investigated the effects of different kinds of reminders on adherence to automated parts of a cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) delivered via a mobile device. Previous studies report that computerized health interventions can be effective. However, treatment adherence is still an issue. Reminders are a simple technique that could improve adherence. A minimal intervention prototype in the realm of sleep treatment was developed to test the effects of reminders on adherence. Two prominent ways to determine the reminder-time are: a) ask users when they want to be reminded, and b) let an algorithm decide when to remind users. The prototype consisted of a sleep diary, a relaxation exercise and reminders. A within subject design was used in which the effect of reminders and two underlying principles were tested by 45 participants that all received the following three different conditions (in random order): a) event-based reminders b) time-based reminders c) no reminders. Both types of reminders improved adherence compared to no reminders. No differences were found between the two types of reminders. Opportunity and self-empowerment could partly mediate adherence to filling out the sleep diary, but not to the number of relaxation exercises conducted. Although the study focussed on CBT-I, we expect that designers of other computerized health interventions benefit from the tested opportunity and self-empowerment principles for reminders to improve adherence, as well.

Indexed as

AdherenceComplianceInsomniaRemindersSelf-helpSleep

Identifiers

PMID29201588
PMCPMC5686282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.