ArticlePeerJ2017
The zebrafish as a model system for analyzing mammalian and native
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contributions of aquatic organisms to understanding the vertebrate ocular lens.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- In vivo imaging reveals exosome-mediated intercellular communication in lens development.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Data-Independent Acquisition Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (diaPASEF) Analysis of the Separated Zebrafish Lens Improves Identifications.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- The generation and characterization of a transgenic zebrafish line with lens-specific Cre expression.Molecular vision · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of α-crystallin protein loss on zebrafish lens development.Experimental eye research · 2023Article
- Single cell transcriptomics of the developing zebrafish lens and identification of putative controllers of lens development.Experimental eye research · 2021Article
- α-Crystallins in the Vertebrate Eye Lens: Complex Oligomers and Molecular Chaperones.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2021Review
- Article
- Quantifying protein dynamics and stability in a living organism.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Proteome-transcriptome analysis and proteome remodeling in mouse lens epithelium and fibers.Experimental eye research · 2019Article
- Why does the zebrafish cloche mutant develop lens cataract?PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have used the zebrafish to investigate the biology of lens crystallin proteins and their roles in development and disease. However, little is known about zebrafish α-crystallin promoter function, how it compares to that of mammals, or whether mammalian α-crystallin promoter activity can be assessed using zebrafish embryos. We injected a variety of α-crystallin promoter fragments from each species combined with the coding sequence for green fluorescent protein (GFP) into zebrafish zygotes to determine the resulting spatiotemporal expression patterns in the developing embryo. We also measured mRNA levels and protein abundance for all three zebrafish α-crystallins. Our data showed that mouse and zebrafish αA-crystallin promoters generated similar GFP expression in the lens, but with earlier onset when using mouse promoters. Expression was also found in notochord and skeletal muscle in a smaller percentage of embryos. Mouse αB-crystallin promoter fragments drove GFP expression primarily in zebrafish skeletal muscle, with less common expression in notochord, lens, heart and in extraocular regions of the eye. A short fragment containing only a lens-specific enhancer region increased lens and notochord GFP expression while decreasing muscle expression, suggesting that the influence of mouse promoter control regions carries over into zebrafish embryos. The two paralogous zebrafish αB-crystallin promoters produced subtly different expression profiles, with the aBa promoter driving expression equally in notochord and skeletal muscle while the αBb promoter resulted primarily in skeletal muscle expression. Messenger RNA for zebrafish αA increased between 1 and 2 days post fertilization (dpf), αBa increased between 4 and 5 dpf, but
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.