Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201493›Full record

ArticleScientifica2017

Analysis of Microbial Diversity in Soil under Ginger Cultivation.

Yiqing Liu, Lin Wu, Xingwen Wu, Honghai Li, Qinhong Liao, Xiaojing Zhang, Zhiqiang Sun, Wenhua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Taxonomical and functional bacterial community profiling in disease-resistant and disease-susceptible soybean cultivars.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Abundance of Plant-AssociatedMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiqing LiuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing, Institute of Special Plants, College of Forestry & Life Science, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan, Chongqing 402160, China.
Lin WuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing, Institute of Special Plants, College of Forestry & Life Science, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan, Chongqing 402160, China.
Xingwen WuLiangping Agro-Technical Extension Station, Liangping, Chongqing 405200, China.
Honghai LiChongqing Engineering and Technology Research Center for Utilization of Ginger Resource, Chongqing Tianpei Agro-Tech Co. Ltd., Yongchuan, Chongqing 402189, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-6917
Qinhong LiaoChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing, Institute of Special Plants, College of Forestry & Life Science, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan, Chongqing 402160, China.
Xiaojing ZhangYantai Lvyun Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Yantai 264003, China.
Zhiqiang SunYantai Lvyun Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Yantai 264003, China.
Wenhua LiYantai Lvyun Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Yantai 264003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ginger is a perennial monocotyledonous herb, which can be used as both a vegetable and a medicinal plant. However, it is susceptible to various plant pathogens. Microbial diversity in soil is related closely to the health and productivity of plant crops including ginger. In the current study, we compared microbial diversity from soil samples under ginger cultivation (disease incidence of >50% [relatively unhealthy sample] versus disease incidence of <10% [relatively healthy sample]). The bacterial and fungal taxa were analyzed by Illumina-based sequencing, with 16S and ITS identification, respectively. Both bacterial and fungal OTUs were significantly more in the healthy soil sample than the unhealthy sample. Moreover, the dominant bacterial and fungal genera were detected to be different in each sample.

Identifiers

PMID29201493
PMCPMC5671753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.