ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2017
Women's perceptions of contraceptive efficacy and safety.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- Health insurance coverages and demand for modern contraceptive choices among reproductive-age women in Thailand.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Voices, Choices, and Access: A Narrative Review of Reproductive Health Awareness and Strategic Schemes in India and Beyond.Health services insights · 2026Review
- Article
- Trends in and Correlates of Short-Acting Contraceptive Stock-Outs: Multicountry Analysis of Performance Monitoring for Action Agile Platform Data.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Relationship between classic indicators of health behaviour and contraceptive choices in women in Flanders.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Perception of women on safety and efficacy of contraceptives: A comparative study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Experiences with Family Planning amongst Persons with Mental Health Problems: A Nationwide Patient Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- [Preventive activities in women. PAPPS update 2022].Atencion primaria · 2022Article
- Improving Communication Messages by Using Perceptual Mapping: Family Planning Survey in East Java and West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.SAGE open medicine · 2021Article
- [Preventive activities in women's care].Atencion primaria · 2020Article
- Knowledge and factors influencing long-acting reversible contraceptives use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria.Gates open research · 2019Article
- Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdoption of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices has been less than might be expected given their superior efficacy and convenience. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge and beliefs held by women, which may influence their contraceptive choices and theirongoing utilization of contraceptive methods.
methodsEnglish speaking, nonpregnant, reproductive-age women, who were not surgically sterilized, were individually interviewed to obtain limited demographic characteristics and to assess their knowledge about the efficacy of various contraceptive methods in typical use and about the relative safety of oral contraceptives.
resultsA convenience sample of 500 women aged 18-45 years, with education levels that ranged from middle school to postdoctoral level was interviewed. The efficacy in typical use of both combined oral contraceptives and male condoms was correctly estimated by 2.2%; over two-thirds of women significantly
conclusionsThe majority of reproductive aged women surveyed substantially overestimated the efficacy of the two most popular contraceptive methods, often saying that they were 99% effective. Women with higher education levels were most likely to overestimate efficacy of oral contraceptives. Women of all ages and education levels significantly overestimated the health hazards of oral contraceptives compared to pregnancy. Overestimation of effectiveness of these methods of contraception, may contribute to lower adoption of implants and intrauterine devices. When individualizing patient counselling, misperceptions must be identified and addressed with women of all educational backgrounds.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.