ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Electroacupuncture improves acute bowel injury recovery in rat models.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for septic gastrointestinal dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Revealing the biological mechanism of acupuncture in alleviating excessive inflammatory responses and organ damage in sepsis: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Electroacupuncture-inspired neuroimmune modulation in sepsis: evidence appraisal and ICU trial-design priorities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Acupuncture modulates the microbiota-gut-brain axis to treat irritable bowel syndrome: a mechanistic exploration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) for the benefits of sepsis-laboratory evidence for "preventive treatment of disease" and "holistic concept" in the protective effects of acupuncture: a literature review of rodent studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Ghrelin in Focus: Dissecting Its Critical Roles in Gastrointestinal Pathologies and Therapies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Protective effect of emodin on intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier integrity in rats with sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) for Experimental Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroacupuncture (EA) accelerates intestinal functional recovery in sepsis. The present study investigated ghrelin and ghrelin receptor (GSH-R) levels during EA in rats with acute bowel injury (ABI). Rats were grouped into four groups: Sham, ABI, ABI+EA and ABI+GHRA+EA (n=12 per group). ABI was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). EA on bilateral Zusanli acupoints was performed following CLP. GSH-R blocker (GHRA) was used following CLP but prior to EA for ABI+GHRA+EA rats. Rats were sacrificed 12 h following CLP. Serum ghrelin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) levels, as well as ghrelin and GSH-R protein expression, water content, pathological changes and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and diamine oxidase (DAO) activities in the bowel tissues, were measured. ABI rats, compared with the sham rats, had significantly lower levels of ghrelin and GSH-R in the serum and bowel tissue, and higher Chiu's score (all P<0.05). The ABI+EA rats, compared with the ABI rats, had significantly reduced serum TNF-α and HMGB1 levels, bowel water content, MPO activity and Chiu's score (all P<0.05), and significantly higher serum ghrelin (121.2±10.7 vs. 86.7±6.4 pg/ml), bowel ghrelin (0.12±0.02 vs. 0.08±0.01), GSH-R (0.05±0.04 vs. 0.03±0.01) and DAO activity (18.74±4.18 vs. 13.52±2.33 U/ml; all P<0.05), indicating an improvement of the intestinal mucosal barrier. GHRA reversed the protective effects of EA. Therefore, EA improved ABI recovery by promoting ghrelin secretion and upregulating GSH-R expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.