Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201157›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2017

Detection of the LINE-1 retrotransposon RNA-binding protein ORF1p in different anatomical regions of the human brain.

Debpali Sur, Raj Kishor Kustwar, Savita Budania, Anita Mahadevan, Dustin C Hancks, Vijay Yadav, S K Shankar, Prabhat K Mandal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Debpali SurDepartment of Biotechnology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.
Raj Kishor Kustwar *Department of Biotechnology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.
Savita Budania *Department of Biotechnology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.
Anita MahadevanHuman Brain Tissue Repository (HBTR), Neurobiology Research Centre, NIMHANS, Bangalore, 560 029 India.
Dustin C HancksDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Vijay YadavSchool of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
S K ShankarHuman Brain Tissue Repository (HBTR), Neurobiology Research Centre, NIMHANS, Bangalore, 560 029 India.
Prabhat K MandalDepartment of Biotechnology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee · INNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INJawaharlal Nehru University · INUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reports indicate that retrotransposons - a type of mobile DNA - can contribute to neuronal genetic diversity in mammals. Retrotransposons are genetic elements that mobilize via an RNA intermediate by a "copy-and-paste" mechanism termed retrotransposition. Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is the only active autonomous retrotransposon in humans and its activity is responsible for ~ 30% of genomic mass. Historically, L1 retrotransposition was thought to be restricted to the germline; however, new data indicate L1 s are active in somatic tissue with certain regions of the brain being highly permissive. The functional implications of L1 insertional activity in the brain and how host cells regulate it are incomplete. While deep sequencing and qPCR analysis have shown that L1 copy number is much higher in certain parts of the human brain, direct in vivo studies regarding detection of L1-encoded proteins is lacking due to ineffective reagents.

resultsUsing a polyclonal antibody we generated against the RNA-binding (RRM) domain of L1 ORF1p, we observe widespread ORF1p expression in post-mortem human brain samples including the hippocampus which has known elevated rates of retrotransposition. In addition, we find that two brains from different individuals of different ages display very different expression of ORF1p, especially in the frontal cortex.

conclusionsWe hypothesize that discordance of ORF1p expression in parts of the brain reported to display elevated levels of retrotransposition may suggest the existence of factors mediating post-translational regulation of L1 activity in the human brain. Furthermore, this antibody reagent will be useful as a complementary means to confirm findings related to retrotransposon biology and activity in the brain and other tissues in vivo.

Indexed as

Active retrotransposition in human brainLINE-1ORF1p antibodyRetrotransposonSomatic mosaicism

Identifiers

PMID29201157
PMCPMC5700708
OpenAlexW2769480528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.