Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200981›Full record

ArticleLanguage learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development2017

Semantic Specificity in One-Year-Olds' Word Comprehension.

Elika Bergelson, Richard Aslin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development in the comprehension of phonetically reduced spoken words.CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Infants who are rarely spoken to nevertheless understand many words.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Familiarity plays a small role in noun comprehension at 12-18 months.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2020
    Article
  14. The Limits of Infants' Early Word Learning.Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Nature and origins of the lexicon in 6-mo-olds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elika BergelsonBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Center for Language Sciences.
Richard AslinBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Center for Language Sciences.

Funding

Visual statistical learning in human infantsR01HD037082 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 1999 to 2022
$6.1M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN THE LANGUAGE SCIENCEST32DC000035 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 1992 to 2013
$4.9M
Mechanisms of Word Learning in InfancyDP5OD019812 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BERGELSON, ELIKA · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037082NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000035NIH HHS DP5 OD019812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated infants' knowledge about familiar nouns. Infants (n = 46, 12-20-month-olds) saw two-image displays of familiar objects, or one familiar and one novel object. Infants heard either a matching word (e.g. "foot' when seeing foot and juice), a related word (e.g. "sock" when seeing foot and juice) or a nonce word (e.g. "fep" when seeing a novel object and dog). Across the whole sample, infants reliably fixated the referent on matching and nonce trials. On the critical related trials we found increasingly less looking to the incorrect (but related) image with age. These results suggest that one-year-olds look at familiar objects both when they hear them labeled and when they hear related labels, to similar degrees, but over the second year increasingly rely on semantic fit. We suggest that infants' initial semantic representations are imprecise, and continue to sharpen over the second postnatal year.

Identifiers

PMID29200981
PMCPMC5711470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.