Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200974›Full record

ReviewCurrent anesthesiology reports2017

Stroke Volume Monitoring: Novel Continuous Wave Doppler Parameters, Algorithms and Advanced Noninvasive Haemodynamic Concepts.

R A Phillips, B E Smith, V M Madigan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current anesthesiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Understanding the Haemodynamics of Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R A PhillipsUltrasound and Cardiovascular Monitoring, Critical Care Research Group, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
B E SmithDiscipline of Intensive Care, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.
V M MadiganUniversity of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAdequate oxygen delivery is essential for life, with hypoxia resulting in dysfunction, and ultimately death, of the cells, organs and organism. Blood flow delivers the oxygen bound in the blood, while haemodynamics is the science of blood flow. Stroke volume (SV) is the fundamental unit of blood flow, and reflects the interdependent performance of the heart, the vessels and the autonomic nervous system. However, haemodynamic management remains generally poor and predominantly guided by simple blood pressure observations alone. RECENT

findingsDoppler ultrasound measures SV with unequalled clinical precision when operated by trained personnel. Combining SV with BP measurements allows calculation of flow-pressure based measures which better reflect cardiovascular performance and allows personalised physiologic and pathophysiologic modelling consistent with Frank's and Starling's observations. SUMMARY: Doppler SV monitoring and novel flow-pressure parameters may improve our understanding of the cardiovascular system and lead to improved diagnosis and therapy. This review examines the physics and practice of Doppler SV monitoring and its application in advanced haemodynamics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsConceptsContinuous wave DopplerHaemodynamic monitoringStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID29200974
PMCPMC5696447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.