Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200934›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2017

Sparse graphs using exchangeable random measures.

François Caron, Emily B Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Causal Inference for Social Network Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Hierarchical network models for exchangeable structured interaction processes.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Personal Connectomics Using Hybrid PET/MRI.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  8. Multiresolution Network Models.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EDGE EXCHANGEABLE MODELS FOR INTERACTION NETWORKS.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2018
    Article
  12. On Edge Exchangeable Random Graphs.Journal of statistical physics · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

François CaronUniversity of Oxford UK.
Emily B FoxUniversity of Washington Seattle USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical network modelling has focused on representing the graph as a discrete structure, namely the adjacency matrix. When assuming exchangeability of this array-which can aid in modelling, computations and theoretical analysis-the Aldous-Hoover theorem informs us that the graph is necessarily either dense or empty. We instead consider representing the graph as an exchangeable

Indexed as

ExchangeabilityGeneralized gamma processLévy measurePoint processRandom graphs

Identifiers

PMID29200934
PMCPMC5699441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.