Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200877›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017

Microtubule-targeting agents can sensitize cancer cells to ionizing radiation by an interphase-based mechanism.

Daniel Markowitz, Grace Ha, Rosamaria Ruggieri, Marc Symons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mebendazole effectively overcomes imatinib resistance by dual-targeting BCR/ABL oncoprotein and β-tubulin in chronic myeloid leukemia cells.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Overcoming cancer therapeutic bottleneck by drug repurposing.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel MarkowitzHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead.
Grace HaKarches Center for Oncology Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Rosamaria RuggieriHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead.
Marc SymonsHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead.
Hofstra University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cytotoxic effects of microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) are often attributed to targeted effects on mitotic cells. In clinical practice, MTAs are combined with DNA-damaging agents such as ionizing radiation (IR) with the rationale that mitotic cells are highly sensitive to DNA damage. In contrast, recent studies suggest that MTAs synergize with IR by interfering with the trafficking of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins during interphase. These studies, however, have yet to demonstrate the functional consequences of interfering with interphase microtubules in the presence of IR. To address this, we combined IR with an established MTA, mebendazole (MBZ), to treat glioma cells exclusively during interphase. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo test whether MTAs can sensitize interphase cells to IR, we treated GL261 and GBM14 glioma cells with MBZ during 3-9 hours post IR (when the mitotic index was 0%). Cell viability was measured using a WST-1 assay, and radiosensitization was quantified using the dose enhancement factor (DEF). The effect of MBZ on the DDR was studied via Western blot analysis of H2AX phosphorylation. To examine the effects of MTAs on intracellular transport of DDR proteins, Nbs1 and Chk2, cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation studies were conducted following treatment of glioma cells with MBZ.

resultsTreatment with MBZ sensitized interphase cells to the effects of IR, with a maximal DEF of 1.34 in GL261 cells and 1.69 in GBM14 cells. Treatment of interphase cells with MBZ led to more sustained γH2AX levels post IR, indicating a delay in the DDR. Exposure of glioma cells to MBZ resulted in a dose-dependent sequestration of Chk2 and Nbs1 in the cytoplasm.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that MBZ can sensitize cancer cells to IR independently of the induction of mitotic arrest. In addition, evidence is provided supporting the hypothesis that MTA-induced radiosensitization is mediated by inhibiting DDR protein accumulation into the nucleus.

Indexed as

DNA damage responseinterphaseionizing radiationmebendazolemicrotubulesradiosensitization

Identifiers

PMID29200877
PMCPMC5703169
OpenAlexW2768811915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.