ReviewVascular health and risk management2017
Efficacy of noninvasive cardiac imaging tests in diagnosis and management of stable coronary artery disease.
Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Impact of CT-Based FFR in Everyday Cardiology: Bridging Computation and Decision-Making.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Distinct Features of Vascular Diseases in COVID-19.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Review
- Assessment of the Efficiency of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Suspected of Having Stable Angina.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Review
- Variation in additional testing and patient outcomes after stress echocardiography or myocardial perfusion imaging, according to accreditation status of testing site.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Observational
- Assessing the downstream value of first-line cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using real world Medicare fee-for-service claims data.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Observational
- Comparison of prognosis and safety of pacemaker implantation in patients aged less than or 85 years and older.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021Article
- Exercise electrocardiography combined with stress echocardiography for predicting myocardial ischemia in adults.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Prediction of Significant Coronary Artery Disease Through Advanced Echocardiography: Role of Non-invasive Myocardial Work.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Circulating microRNA as a Biomarker for Coronary Artery Disease.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Education-related variation in coronary procedure rates and the contribution of private health care in Australia: a prospective cohort study.International journal for equity in health · 2020Article
- The Role of Gender in the Importance of Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiology research and practice · 2020Article
- Integrated bioinformatics analysis identifies microRNA-376a-3p as a new microRNA biomarker in patient with coronary artery disease.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography vs transoesophageal echocardiography for infective endocarditis - A meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this review was to discuss the current literature regarding the utility of noninvasive imaging in diagnosis and management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) including recent data from large randomized trials assessing diagnosis and prognosis. Current guidelines recommend revascularization in patients with refractory angina and in those with potential prognostic benefit. Appropriate risk stratification through noninvasive assessment is important in ensuring patients are not exposed to unnecessary invasive coronary angiograms. The past 20 years have seen an unprecedented expansion in noninvasive imaging modalities for the assessment of stable CAD, with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and computed tomography complementing established techniques such as myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiography and exercise electrocardiogram. In this review, we examine the current state-of-the-art in noninvasive imaging to provide an up-to-date analysis of current investigation and management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.