Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200836›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2017

Computerized cognitive stimulation and engagement programs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: comparing feasibility, acceptability, and cognitive and psychosocial effects.

Leila Djabelkhir, Ya-Huei Wu, Jean-Sébastien Vidal, Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix, Fabienne Marlats, Hermine Lenoir, Ariela Carno, Anne-Sophie Rigaud

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05532904 (Evaluation and Comparison of Multidisciplinary Day-hospital Versus Waiting List Management of Persistent Symptoms After an Acute Episode of COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05532904 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation and Comparison of Multidisciplinary Day-hospital Versus Waiting List Management of Persistent Symptoms After an Acute Episode of COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsPost COVID-19 ConditionArmsPersonalized multidisciplinary day-hospital intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila DjabelkhirDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Ya-Huei WuDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Jean-Sébastien VidalDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Victoria Cristancho-LacroixDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Fabienne MarlatsDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Hermine LenoirDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Ariela CarnoDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Anne-Sophie RigaudDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Public Assistance - Paris Hospitals (AP-HP).
Délégation Paris 5 · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is associated with a higher risk of dementia and is becoming a topic of interest for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. With advances in technology, computer-based cognitive exercises are increasingly integrated into traditional cognitive interventions, such as cognitive training. Another type of cognitive intervention involving technology use is cognitive engagement, consisting of involving participants in highly motivational and mentally challenging activities, such as learning to use a form of new digital technology. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a computerized cognitive stimulation (CCS) program and a computerized cognitive engagement (CCE) program, and then compared their effects in older adults with MCI. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this randomized study, data from 19 MCI patients were analyzed (n=9 in CCS and n=10 in CCE). The patients attended a group weekly session for a duration of 3 months. Assessments of cognitive and psychosocial variables were conducted at baseline (M0) and at the end of the programs (M3).

resultsAll of the participants attended the 12 sessions and showed a high level of motivation. Attrition rate was very low (one dropout at M3 assessment). At M3, the CCS participants displayed a significant improvement in part B of the Trail Making Test (TMT-B;

conclusionBoth interventions were highly feasible and acceptable and allowed improvement in different aspects of cognitive and psychosocial functioning in MCI subjects.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSoftwareAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMotivationSelf ConceptSingle-Blind Methodcognitive interventionmild cognitive impairmenttablet computerstechnology

Identifiers

PMID29200836
PMCPMC5702161
OpenAlexW2769350199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.