Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200823›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Six-month postoperative outcomes of intraoperative OCT-guided surgical cystotomy for refractory cystoid macular edema in diabetic eyes.

Yuichi Asahina, Naoko Tachi, Yumi Asahina, Kayoko Yoshimura, Yoshiki Ueta, Yoshihiro Hashimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Current Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Surgical cystotomy for refractory diabetic cystoid macular edema.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuichi AsahinaEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.
Naoko TachiEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.
Yumi AsahinaEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.
Kayoko YoshimuraEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.
Yoshiki UetaEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.
Yoshihiro HashimotoEye Center, Shinseikai Toyama Hospital, Imizu, Toyama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the outcomes of surgical cystotomy for recurrent diabetic cystoid macular edema (CME). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed 20 eyes with a clinical diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and refractory CME. Release of vitreoretinal adhesion, epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and cystotomy guided by intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) were performed in every patient. Pars plana vitrectomy was also performed in 17 patients, 11 of whom also underwent lensectomy and intraocular lens implantation. Central retinal thickness (CRT), central minimum macular thickness (CMMT), macular volume (MV) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared preoperatively and 1 and 6 months post surgery.

resultsCRT, CMMT and MV significantly improved 1 and 6 months post surgery in each group (

conclusionCRT, CMMT, MV and BCVA significantly improved 6 months following surgical cystectomy. This implies that iOCT-guided cystotomy could be another treatment option for refractory CME in diabetic eyes.

Indexed as

cystoid macular edemacystotomydiabetic retinopathyintraoperative OCT

Identifiers

PMID29200823
PMCPMC5703175
OpenAlexW2769517742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.