ArticleSouth African health review2017
Pharmacovigilance: A public health priority for South Africa.
Article in South African health review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening pharmacovigilance and regulatory capacity in Southern Africa (SPaRCS): achievements, experiences and lessons learned from a participatory action learning project.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Article
- Barriers and enablers of adverse drug event reporting in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey of medicine users.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Adverse Drug Events and Reporting in South Africa.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Development of a checklist for the assessment of pharmacovigilance guidelines in Southern Africa: a document review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2023Article
- Perceptions, practices and barriers to reporting of adverse drug reactions among HIV infected patients and their doctors in 3 public sector hospitals of the Ethekwini Metropolitan, Kwa-Zulu Natal: a cross sectional and retrospective analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Views on Pharmacovigilance System, Policy, and Coordination in Pakistan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Reporting and recording of adverse drug reactions of highly active antiretroviral therapy by HIV infected patients and healthcare professionals respectively in the Ethekwini Metropolitan of Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa: a cross-sectional and retrospective comparative study.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Parental reporting of adverse drug reactions in South Africa: An online survey.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021Article
- An analysis of the trends, characteristics, scope, and performance of the Zimbabwean pharmacovigilance reporting scheme.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting in public sector primary health care facilities in a South African district.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Enhancing Pharmacovigilance in Sub-Saharan Africa Through Training and Mentoring: A GSK Pilot Initiative in Malawi.Drug safety · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
South Africa has been engaged in pharmacovigilance (PV) activities to assess the impact of adverse drug reactions on public safety and health for 40 years. Activities have evolved from passive regulatory reporting to encompass active surveillance systems. The HIV and AIDS and TB epidemics stimulated pharmacoepidemiological research into the risks associated with medicines used in the standardised regimens of mass treatment programmes. Specific safety concerns, supported by robust local cohort data, have prompted major changes to national and international treatment policies. This chapter describes the expanding body of local knowledge and the historical and emergent surveillance systems that address the burden of drug-related harms, noting the challenges to health system responsiveness. The South African context presents a unique opportunity to characterise the scale and nature of such harms in mass HIV and AIDS and TB treatment programmes. The use of complex regimens at scale poses new PV challenges. There is an urgent need to develop cohesive, sustainable systems to support evidence-based decisions on appropriate regimen choices, while minimising medicine-associated risks. The increasing use of computerised clinical, laboratory and dispensing records, with unique patient identifiers facilitating data linkage, will increase PV surveillance capacity. A coherent national PV framework is an essential part of medicines policy, encompassing regulatory, programmatic and individual needs. Key pillars of this framework include: (i) consolidation and expansion of active and passive PV surveillance, optimising existing programmes; (ii) prioritising post-marketing monitoring within the new health products regulatory authority; and (iii) instilling a culture of active risk management in clinical practice through the creation of effective channels of communication and feedback into policy and practice.
Identifiers
29200789PMC5708547W2981920519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.