Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200789›Full record

ArticleSouth African health review2017

Pharmacovigilance: A public health priority for South Africa.

Ushma Mehta, Emma Kalk, Andrew Boulle, Portia Nkambule, Joey Gouws, Helen Rees, Karen Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South African health review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parental reporting of adverse drug reactions in South Africa: An online survey.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ushma MehtaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town.
Emma KalkSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town.
Andrew BoulleSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town.
Portia NkambuleMedicines Regulation Unit, National Department of Health.
Joey GouwsMedicines Regulation Unit, National Department of Health.
Helen ReesSouth African Medicines Control Council.
Karen CohenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town.
University of Cape Town · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

B positive_A population based evaluation of expanded ART access in pregnancyR01HD080465 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI KALK, EMMA KATE · 2014 to 2019
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South Africa has been engaged in pharmacovigilance (PV) activities to assess the impact of adverse drug reactions on public safety and health for 40 years. Activities have evolved from passive regulatory reporting to encompass active surveillance systems. The HIV and AIDS and TB epidemics stimulated pharmacoepidemiological research into the risks associated with medicines used in the standardised regimens of mass treatment programmes. Specific safety concerns, supported by robust local cohort data, have prompted major changes to national and international treatment policies. This chapter describes the expanding body of local knowledge and the historical and emergent surveillance systems that address the burden of drug-related harms, noting the challenges to health system responsiveness. The South African context presents a unique opportunity to characterise the scale and nature of such harms in mass HIV and AIDS and TB treatment programmes. The use of complex regimens at scale poses new PV challenges. There is an urgent need to develop cohesive, sustainable systems to support evidence-based decisions on appropriate regimen choices, while minimising medicine-associated risks. The increasing use of computerised clinical, laboratory and dispensing records, with unique patient identifiers facilitating data linkage, will increase PV surveillance capacity. A coherent national PV framework is an essential part of medicines policy, encompassing regulatory, programmatic and individual needs. Key pillars of this framework include: (i) consolidation and expansion of active and passive PV surveillance, optimising existing programmes; (ii) prioritising post-marketing monitoring within the new health products regulatory authority; and (iii) instilling a culture of active risk management in clinical practice through the creation of effective channels of communication and feedback into policy and practice.

Identifiers

PMID29200789
PMCPMC5708547
OpenAlexW2981920519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.