Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200522›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

Access to maternal health services: geographical inequalities, United Republic of Tanzania.

Claudia Hanson, Sabine Gabrysch, Godfrey Mbaruku, Jonathan Cox, Elibariki Mkumbo, Fatuma Manzi, Joanna Schellenberg, Carine Ronsmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia HansonDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT England.
Sabine GabryschInstitute of Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Godfrey MbarukuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Jonathan CoxBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, United States of America.
Elibariki MkumboIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Fatuma ManziIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Joanna SchellenbergDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT England.
Carine RonsmansDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if improved geographical accessibility led to increased uptake of maternity care in the south of the United Republic of Tanzania.

methodsIn a household census in 2007 and another large household survey in 2013, we investigated 22 243 and 13 820 women who had had a recent live birth, respectively. The proportions calculated from the 2013 data were weighted to account for the sampling strategy. We examined the association between the straight-line distances to the nearest primary health facility or hospital and uptake of maternity care.

findingsThe percentages of live births occurring in primary facilities and hospitals rose from 12% (2571/22 243) and 29% (6477/22 243), respectively, in 2007 to weighted values of 39% and 40%, respectively, in 2013. Between the two surveys, women living far from hospitals showed a marked gain in their use of primary facilities, but the proportion giving birth in hospitals remained low (20%). Use of four or more antenatal visits appeared largely unaffected by survey year or the distance to the nearest antenatal clinic. Although the overall percentage of live births delivered by caesarean section increased from 4.1% (913/22 145) in the first survey to a weighted value of 6.5% in the second, the corresponding percentages for women living far from hospital were very low in 2007 (2.8%; 35/1254) and 2013 (3.3%).

conclusionFor women living in our study districts who sought maternity care, access to primary facilities appeared to improve between 2007 and 2013, however access to hospital care and caesarean sections remained low.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth Status DisparitiesMaternal Health ServicesCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHome ChildbirthHumansPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsTanzania

Identifiers

PMID29200522
PMCPMC5710083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.