Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200481›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics

Cervical Laminectomy with Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Neurological and Sagittal Alignment Outcome: Do We Need Lateral Mass Screws at each Segment?

Manoj Dayalal Singrakhia, Nikhil Ramdas Malewar, Sonal Manoj Singrakhia, Shivaji Subhash Deshmukh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06045663 (Cervical Laminectomy With or Without Lateral Mass Fixation in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06045663 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cervical Laminectomy With or Without Lateral Mass Fixation in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsDegenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM)Armslaminectomy without lateral mass fixation, laminectomy with lateral mass fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manoj Dayalal SingrakhiaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shanta Spine Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Nikhil Ramdas MalewarDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shanta Spine Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Sonal Manoj SingrakhiaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Shanta Spine Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Shivaji Subhash DeshmukhDepartment of Anaesthesia, Shanta Spine Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior cervical decompression and fusion is the standard procedure used for treating patients with cervical myelopathy. However, these procedures are associated with complications such as pseudarthrosis, construct failure, and neurological complications. Posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumentation is an alternative procedure to treat multilevel cervical myelopathy. In this study, we raised questions whether instrumentation is required at all levels and whether stabilizing the spine in neutral or lordotic contour with indirect decompression leads to neurological improvement with radiological evidence of anterior decompression. The results of posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumentation with lateral mass screw in terms of radiological and functional outcome in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy are prospectively evaluated. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective study conducted between June 2006 and December 2015, we have evaluated 112 patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy who underwent multilevel cervical laminectomy and instrumentation with lateral mass screw. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with Nurick's grading and Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale for neurological function. Cooper scale and British Medical Research Council grading system for motor function. Curvature index was used to measure the alignment of cervical spine preoperatively and postoperatively. Alignment of the cervical spine was done preoperatively and postoperatively by calculating the curvature index. Axial MRI was used to calculate the severity of compression preoperatively which was calculated as per Singh's criteria and postoperatively to assess the adequacy of decompression at the operated level.

resultsIn our study, there were 112 patients including 99 males and 13 females, with mean age of 59.53 years. The mean duration of followup of patients was 33.24 months. In total, cervical laminectomy was performed at 342 levels in 112 patients with an average of 3.05 laminectomies, and in total, 112 lateral mass screws were inserted. On postoperative followup, the mJOA and Nurick's grading showed improvement in all cases as compared to preoperative findings. The mean mJOA improved significantly from 8.56 preoperatively to 13.57 postoperatively (

conclusionThe multilevel cervical laminectomy and instrumentation with lateral mass screw for multilevel cervical myelopathy is a safe technique that provides decompression of the spinal cord, prevents the development of kyphotic spinal deformity and posterior tension band of the spinal cord as associated with laminoplasty or uninstrumented laminectomy.

Indexed as

Bone screwsCervical laminectomycervical myelopathyindirect decompressionlaminectomylateral mass screwmyelopathyspinal cord compression

Identifiers

PMID29200481
PMCPMC5688858
OpenAlexW2768013092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.