Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200476›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2017

Outcome of Cesarean Myomectomy: Is it a Safe Procedure?

Mehmet Baki Senturk, Mesut Polat, Ozan Doğan, Çiğdem Pulatoğlu, Oğuz Devrim Yardımcı, Resul Karakuş, Ahter Tanay Tayyar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caesarean myomectomy in pregnant women with uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet Baki SenturkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medeniyet University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mesut PolatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medeniyet University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozan DoğanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medeniyet University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Çiğdem PulatoğluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bayburt Government Hospital, Bayburt, Turkey.
Oğuz Devrim YardımcıDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medeniyet University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Resul KarakuşDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahter Tanay TayyarDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Medeniyet University · TRZeynep Kamil Hospital · TRBayburt State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMyomectomy performed during cesarean section is still controversial because of the potential for associated complications, especially with large myomas. Many obstetricians avoid performing cesarean myomectomy procedures because of the risk of uncontrollable hemorrhage. However, the prevalence of pregnant women with myomas is increasing, leading to an increase in the likelihood that physicians will encounter this issue. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications of patients who either had or did not have cesarean myomectomy.

methodA total of 361 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients who had cesarean section with myomectomy and patients had cesarean section without myomectomy were compared with regard to demographics, drop in hemoglobin levels, complications, blood transfusion rates and duration of operation. These parameters were also compared when the diameter of the myoma was larger than 5 cm. Values of p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsWhile maternal age and gravidity were similar in both groups (p > 0.05), the mean myoma diameter was smaller and the duration of operation was longer in the group who underwent cesarean myomectomy (p < 0.05). The reduction in hemoglobin level, rate of complications, and number of transfusions were similar in both groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionThis study shows that myomectomy during cesarean section does not increase complications or transfusion rates and appears to be a safe procedure.

Indexed as

cesarean myomectomycesarean sectioncomplicationsmyoma

Identifiers

PMID29200476
PMCPMC5703655
OpenAlexW2771037894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.