Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29200471›Full record

ArticleEntomologia experimentalis et applicata2017

Implementing the sterile insect technique with RNA interference - a review.

Michael Darrington, Tamas Dalmay, Neil I Morrison, Tracey Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Lysenko and the Screwworm Fly-When Politics Interferes with Science and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael DarringtonSchool of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich Norfolk NR4 7TJ UK.
Tamas DalmaySchool of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich Norfolk NR4 7TJ UK.
Neil I MorrisonOxitec Limited 71 Innovation Drive, Milton Park Oxford OX14 4RQ UK.
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich Norfolk NR4 7TJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2401-8120

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K000489/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review RNA interference (RNAi) of insect pests and its potential for implementing sterile insect technique (SIT)-related control. The molecular mechanisms that support RNAi in pest species are reviewed in detail, drawing on literature from a range of species including

Indexed as

double‐stranded RNAenvironmental RNAiinsect controlnon‐GM pest controlSIT

Identifiers

PMID29200471
PMCPMC5697603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.