ReviewClinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O2017
The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma.
Review in Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone at first relapse in lenalidomide-pretreated myeloma: A subanalysis of OPTIMISMM by clinical characteristics.European journal of haematology · 2022Trial
- Disease-controlled multiple myeloma in a patient with 17p gain and t(4;14): A case report.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- [The efficacy and safety of bortezomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone regimen in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2023Article
- Review
- Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics: IKEMA subgroup analysis.European journal of haematology · 2022Article
- [The efficacy and safety profile of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter real-world study in China].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2021Article
- Subgroup analysis of ICARIA-MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics.British journal of haematology · 2021Article
- Review
- Treatment Strategies Considering Micro-Environment and Clonal Evolution in Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Two rare cases of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3) and 1q duplication: case presentation and literature review.Molecular cytogenetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease with a prognosis that varies with patient factors, disease burden, tumor biology, and treatments. Certain molecular abnormalities confer a worse prognosis and thus are considered high-risk. These include t(4;14), del(17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), hypodiploidy, and gain(1q)/del(1p). In our previous review in 2013, we discussed the effect of available therapies on prognosis in these high-risk patients. Since then, seven phase 3 clinical trials in relapsed myeloma with 1 to 3 lines of therapy have been conducted, resulting in the approval of panobinostat, ixazomib, daratumumab, and elotuzumab, as well as additional data on carfilzomib. In our current review of these studies, all the novel therapies resulted in an improvement in progression-free survival for high-risk patients, but none of the trials provided clear statistical evidence that they overcame high-risk status. Moreover, there are several limitations in the currently available data. For example, the patient's Revised International Staging System score is generally not reported, and even when it is reported, it is usually at the time of initial diagnosis rather than at the time of study entry. Furthermore, the methodology used to determine risk suffers from technologic issues. Finally, the clonal and allele burden and concurrent molecular abnormalities can affect risk status and prognosis. To determine the optimal therapy for high-risk patients, future clinical trials should provide standardized risk assessments for all patients in addition to hazard ratios for Kaplan-Meier survival curves of high-risk patients vs those of standard-risk patients to determine if high-risk status has truly been overcome by a novel agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29200420PMC5993678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.