Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29199920›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Consumers' understanding and expectations of a community-based recovery-oriented mental health rehabilitation unit: a pragmatic grounded theory analysis.

Stephen Parker, Frances Dark, Ellie Newman, Dominic Hanley, William McKinlay, Carla Meurk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen ParkerRehabilitation ACU, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service (MSAMHS),Brisbane,Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-3981
Frances DarkRehabilitation ACU, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service (MSAMHS),Brisbane,Australia.
Ellie NewmanRehabilitation ACU, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service (MSAMHS),Brisbane,Australia.
Dominic HanleyRehabilitation ACU, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service (MSAMHS),Brisbane,Australia.
William McKinlayRehabilitation ACU, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service (MSAMHS),Brisbane,Australia.
Carla MeurkUniversity of Queensland, School of Public Health,Herston,Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIncorporating consumer perspectives into mental health services design is important in working to deliver recovery-oriented care. One of the challenges faced in mental health rehabilitation services is limited consumer engagement with the available support. Listening to consumers' expectations of mental health services, and what they hope to achieve, provides an opportunity to examine the alignment between existing services and the priorities and preferences of the people who use them. We explored consumer understandings and expectations of three recovery-oriented community-based residential mental-health rehabilitation units using semi-structured interviews; two of these units were trialling a staffing model integrating peer support with clinical care.

methodsTwenty-four consumers completed semi-structured interviews with an independent interviewer during the first 6 weeks of their stay at the rehabilitation unit. Most participants had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder (87%). A pragmatic approach to grounded theory guided the analysis, facilitating identification of content and themes, and the development of an overarching conceptual map.

resultsThe rehabilitation units were considered to provide a transformational space and a transitional place. The most common reason given for engagement was housing insecurity or homelessness rather than the opportunity for rehabilitation engagement. Differences in expectations did not emerge between consumers entering the clinical and integrated staffing model sites.

conclusionsConsumers understand the function of the rehabilitation service they are entering. However, receiving rehabilitation support may not be the key driver of their attendance. This finding has implications for promoting consumer engagement with rehabilitation services. The absence of differences between the integrated and clinical staffing models may reflect the novelty of the rehabilitation context. The study highlights the need for staff to find better ways to increase consumer awareness of the potential relevance of evidence-based rehabilitation support to facilitating their recovery.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthCommunity Mental Health ServicesCommunity ParticipationFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMotivationPsychiatric RehabilitationQualitative ResearchQualitative researchrehabilitationresidential servicesschizophreniaservice-user perspectives

Identifiers

PMID29199920
PMCPMC6998963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.