Trial reportJournal of neural engineering2018
Signal processing methods for reducing artifacts in microelectrode brain recordings caused by functional electrical stimulation.
Trial report in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Restoring rapid natural bimanual typing with a neuroprosthesis after paralysis.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Learning-related population dynamics in right and left dorsal premotor cortex during typing skill acquisition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Long-term independent use of an intracortical brain-computer interface for speech and cursor control.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- logLIRA: a method for reliable suppression of electrical stimulation artifacts enabling short-latency neural response recovery.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Encoding of speech modes and loudness in ventral precentral gyrus.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Decoding intended speech with an intracortical brain-computer interface in a person with long-standing anarthria and locked-in syndrome.Cell reports · 2026Article
- A dual-function dry electrode for electromyography recording and transcutaneous electrical stimulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- An instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesis.Nature · 2025Article
- Long-term performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays in 14 BrainGate clinical trial participants.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Error encoding in human speech motor cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Encoding of speech modes and loudness in ventral precentral gyrus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Reducing power requirements for high-accuracy decoding in iBCIs.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- An instantaneous voice synthesis neuroprosthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A flexible intracortical brain-computer interface for typing using finger movements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) is a promising technology for restoring movement to paralyzed limbs. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) have enabled intuitive control over virtual and robotic movements, and more recently over upper extremity FES neuroprostheses. However, electrical stimulation of muscles creates artifacts in intracortical microelectrode recordings that could degrade iBCI performance. Here, we investigate methods for reducing the cortically recorded artifacts that result from peripheral electrical stimulation. APPROACH: One participant in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial had two intracortical microelectrode arrays placed in the motor cortex, and thirty-six stimulating intramuscular electrodes placed in the muscles of the contralateral limb. We characterized intracortically recorded electrical artifacts during both intramuscular and surface stimulation. We compared the performance of three artifact reduction methods: blanking, common average reference (CAR) and linear regression reference (LRR), which creates channel-specific reference signals, composed of weighted sums of other channels. MAIN
resultsElectrical artifacts resulting from surface stimulation were 175 × larger than baseline neural recordings (which were 110 µV peak-to-peak), while intramuscular stimulation artifacts were only 4 × larger. The artifact waveforms were highly consistent across electrodes within each array. Application of LRR reduced artifact magnitudes to less than 10 µV and largely preserved the original neural feature values used for decoding. Unmitigated stimulation artifacts decreased iBCI decoding performance, but performance was almost completely recovered using LRR, which outperformed CAR and blanking and extracted useful neural information during stimulation artifact periods. SIGNIFICANCE: The LRR method was effective at reducing electrical artifacts resulting from both intramuscular and surface FES, and almost completely restored iBCI decoding performance (>90% recovery for surface stimulation and full recovery for intramuscular stimulation). The results demonstrate that FES-induced artifacts can be easily mitigated in FES + iBCI systems by using LRR for artifact reduction, and suggest that the LRR method may also be useful in other noise reduction applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.