Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29199642›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural engineering2018

Signal processing methods for reducing artifacts in microelectrode brain recordings caused by functional electrical stimulation.

D Young, F Willett, W D Memberg, B Murphy, B Walter, J Sweet, J Miller, L R Hochberg, R F Kirsch, A B Ajiboye

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Error encoding in human speech motor cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Encoding of speech modes and loudness in ventral precentral gyrus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  17. Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. An instantaneous voice synthesis neuroprosthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D YoungCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1861-971X
F WillettCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-8511
W D MembergCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2545-8574
B MurphyCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-3434
B WalterNeurology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
J SweetNeurosurgery, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
J MillerNeurosurgery, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
L R HochbergCenter for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-2273
R F KirschCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
A B AjiboyeCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

Funding

Restoring Communication with an Intracortical Neural Interface SystemR01DC009899 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2009 to 2017
$7.0M
Integrated Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation Training ProgramT32EB004314 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey R Capadona, Robert F. Kirsch · 2004 to 2026
$6.1M
Intracortical control of FES-restored arm and hand function in people with SCIR01HD077220 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KIRSCH, ROBERT F. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
Influencing Children's Beliefs Through LanguageR03HD053403 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KEEN, RACHEL ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2008
$150k
BrainGate: Robust Neural Decoding for Veterans with ALSI01RX002295 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2017 to 2025
–
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004314NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD053403NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD077220NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009899RRD VA I01 RX002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) is a promising technology for restoring movement to paralyzed limbs. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) have enabled intuitive control over virtual and robotic movements, and more recently over upper extremity FES neuroprostheses. However, electrical stimulation of muscles creates artifacts in intracortical microelectrode recordings that could degrade iBCI performance. Here, we investigate methods for reducing the cortically recorded artifacts that result from peripheral electrical stimulation. APPROACH: One participant in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial had two intracortical microelectrode arrays placed in the motor cortex, and thirty-six stimulating intramuscular electrodes placed in the muscles of the contralateral limb. We characterized intracortically recorded electrical artifacts during both intramuscular and surface stimulation. We compared the performance of three artifact reduction methods: blanking, common average reference (CAR) and linear regression reference (LRR), which creates channel-specific reference signals, composed of weighted sums of other channels. MAIN

resultsElectrical artifacts resulting from surface stimulation were 175  ×  larger than baseline neural recordings (which were 110 µV peak-to-peak), while intramuscular stimulation artifacts were only 4  ×  larger. The artifact waveforms were highly consistent across electrodes within each array. Application of LRR reduced artifact magnitudes to less than 10 µV and largely preserved the original neural feature values used for decoding. Unmitigated stimulation artifacts decreased iBCI decoding performance, but performance was almost completely recovered using LRR, which outperformed CAR and blanking and extracted useful neural information during stimulation artifact periods. SIGNIFICANCE: The LRR method was effective at reducing electrical artifacts resulting from both intramuscular and surface FES, and almost completely restored iBCI decoding performance (>90% recovery for surface stimulation and full recovery for intramuscular stimulation). The results demonstrate that FES-induced artifacts can be easily mitigated in FES  +  iBCI systems by using LRR for artifact reduction, and suggest that the LRR method may also be useful in other noise reduction applications.

Indexed as

ArtifactsElectrodes, ImplantedSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedArmBrain-Computer InterfacesDeep Brain StimulationHumansMicroelectrodesMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPilot ProjectsSpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID29199642
PMCPMC5818316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.