Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29198212›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

Rubella vaccination in India: identifying broad consequences of vaccine introduction and key knowledge gaps.

A K Winter, S Pramanik, J Lessler, M Ferrari, B T Grenfell, C J E Metcalf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Study Prevalence of Congenital Rubella Syndrome Cases Before and After Rubella Vaccination Campaign.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A K WinterEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University,Princeton, NJ,USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-7003
S PramanikPublic Health Foundation of India,Gurgaon, Haryana,India.
J LesslerDepartment of Epidemiology,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore, MD,USA.
M FerrariIGDP in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University,University Park, PA,USA.
B T GrenfellEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University,Princeton, NJ,USA.
C J E MetcalfEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University,Princeton, NJ,USA.
Princeton University · USJohns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · USPublic Health Foundation of India · IN

Funding

Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SALGANIK, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubella virus infection typically presents as a mild illness in children; however, infection during pregnancy may cause the birth of an infant with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). As of February 2017, India began introducing rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into the public-sector childhood vaccination programme. Low-level RCV coverage among children over several years can result in an increase in CRS incidence by increasing the average age of infection without sufficiently reducing rubella incidence. We evaluated the impact of RCV introduction on CRS incidence across India's heterogeneous demographic and epidemiological contexts. We used a deterministic age-structured model that reflects Indian states' rural and urban area-specific demography and vaccination coverage levels to simulate rubella dynamics and estimate CRS incidence with and without RCV introduction to the public sector. Our analysis suggests that current low-level private-sector vaccination has already slightly increased the burden of CRS in India. We additionally found that the effect of public-sector RCV introduction depends on the basic reproductive number, R 0, of rubella. If R 0 is five, a value empirically estimated from an array of settings, CRS incidence post-RCV introduction will likely decrease. However, if R 0 is seven or nine, some states may experience short-term or annual increases in CRS, even if a long-term total reduction in cases (30 years) is expected. Investment in population-based serological surveys and India's fever/rash surveillance system will be key to monitoring the success of the vaccination programme.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansIncidenceIndiaInfantModels, TheoreticalRubellaRubella Syndrome, CongenitalRubella VaccineRubella virusVaccinationRubella VaccineCongenital rubella syndromeCRSIndiarubellavaccine

Identifiers

PMID29198212
PMCPMC6024169
OpenAlexW2772849835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.