Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29197676›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2018

Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Total Body Irradiation Pretransplant Conditioning for Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Partow Kebriaei, Claudio Anasetti, Mei-Jie Zhang, Hai-Lin Wang, Ibrahim Aldoss, Marcos de Lima, H Jean Khoury, Brenda M Sandmaier, Mary M Horowitz, Andrew Artz and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. VMAT-based total body irradiation on a conventional LINAC: workflow, procedure and preliminary results.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Conditioning Regimen Options.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Transplant in ALL: who, when, and how?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

Partow KebriaeiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: pkebriaei@mdanderson.org.
Claudio AnasettiBlood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Mei-Jie ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Hai-Lin WangCIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Ibrahim AldossDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Marcos de LimaDepartment of Medicine, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
H Jean KhouryDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brenda M SandmaierDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Mary M HorowitzCIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Andrew ArtzSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Nelli BejanyanDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stefan CiureaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Hillard M LazarusDepartment of Medicine, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert Peter GaleHematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark LitzowDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
Christopher BredesonOttawa Hospital Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew D SeftelDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Michael A PulsipherDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Jaap-Jan BoelensUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joseph AlvarnasDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Richard ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stephen FormanDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Vinod PullarkatDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Daniel WeisdorfDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David I MarksAdult Bone Marrow Transplant, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Acute Leukemia Committee of the CIBMTR
City of Hope · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USCancerCare Manitoba · CAChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USEmory University Hospital · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USImperial College London · GBMayo Clinic · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total body irradiation (TBI) has been included in standard conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Non-TBI regimens have incorporated busulfan (Bu) to decrease toxicity. This retrospective study analyzed TBI and Bu on outcomes of ALL patients 18-60 years old, in first or second complete remission (CR), undergoing HLA-compatible sibling, related, or unrelated donor HCT, who reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research from 2005 to 2014. TBI plus etoposide (25%) or cyclophosphamide (75%) was used in 819 patients, and intravenous Bu plus fludarabine (41%), clofarabine (30%), cyclophosphamide (15%), or melphalan (13%) was used in 299 patients. Bu-containing regimens were analyzed together, since no significant differences for patient outcomes were noted between them. Bu patients were older, with better performance status; took longer to achieve first CR and receive HCT; were treated more recently; and were more likely to receive peripheral blood grafts, antithymocyte globulin, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. With median follow-up of 3.6 years for Bu and 5.3 years for TBI, adjusted 3-year outcomes showed treatment-related mortality Bu 19% versus TBI 25% (P = .04); relapse Bu 37% versus TBI 28% (P = .007); disease-free survival (DFS) Bu 45% versus TBI 48% (P = .35); and overall survival (OS) Bu 57% versus TBI 53% (P = .35). In multivariate analysis, Bu patients had higher risk of relapse (relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.85; P = .002) compared with TBI patients. Despite the higher relapse, Bu-containing conditioning led to similar OS and DFS following HCT for ALL.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningWhole-Body IrradiationAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAllograftsBusulfanDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaSurvival RateBusulfanAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAllogeneic transplantBusulfanTotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID29197676
PMCPMC5902420
OpenAlexW2774624088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.