Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29197372›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

The choice that matters: the relative influence of socioeconomic status indicators on chronic back pain- a longitudinal study.

Michael Fliesser, Jessie De Witt Huberts, Pia-Maria Wippert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protection from Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Scoping Review.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael FliesserSociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany. fliesser@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-1660
Jessie De Witt HubertsSociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Pia-Maria WippertSociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Rentenversicherung Berlin-Brandenburg 10-40.07.05.03.016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn health research, indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) are often used interchangeably and often lack theoretical foundation. This makes it difficult to compare results from different studies and to explore the relationship between SES and health outcomes. To aid researchers in choosing appropriate indicators of SES, this article proposes and tests a theory-based selection of SES indicators using chronic back pain as a health outcome.

methodsStrength of relationship predictions were made using Brunner & Marmot's model of 'social determinants of health'. Subsequently, a longitudinal study was conducted with 66 patients receiving in-patient treatment for chronic back pain. Sociodemographic variables, four SES indicators (education, job position, income, multidimensional index) and back pain intensity and disability were obtained at baseline. Both pain dimensions were assessed again 6 months later. Using linear regression, the predictive strength of each SES indicator on pain intensity and disability was estimated and compared to the theory based prediction.

resultsChronic back pain intensity was best predicted by the multidimensional index (beta = 0.31, p < 0.05), followed by job position (beta = 0.29, p < 0.05) and education (beta = -0.29, p < 0.05); whereas, income exerted no significant influence. Back pain disability was predicted strongest by education (beta = -0.30, p < 0.05) and job position (beta = 0.29, p < 0.05). Here, multidimensional index and income had no significant influence.

conclusionsThe choice of SES indicators influences predictive power on both back pain dimensions, suggesting SES predictors cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, researchers should carefully consider prior to each study which SES indicator to use. The introduced framework can be valuable in supporting this decision because it allows for a stable prediction of SES indicator influence and their hierarchy on a specific health outcomes.

Indexed as

Back PainChronic PainSocial ClassAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPersons with DisabilitiesRegression AnalysisSocioeconomic FactorsChronic back painEducationIncomeIndicators of socioeconomic status, Health inequalityJob positionSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID29197372
PMCPMC5712136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.