Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29197311›Full record

ArticleSouthern medical journal2017

Radiologists' Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Inpatient CT Studies: Do Referring Physicians Follow Them?

Owen Hanley, Amir Lotfi, Tiara Sanborn, Jennifer L Friderici, Janice Fitzgerald, Poornima Manikantan, Linda Canty, Mihaela S Stefan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Southern medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Owen HanleyFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Amir LotfiFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Tiara SanbornFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Jennifer L FridericiFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Janice FitzgeraldFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Poornima ManikantanFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Linda CantyFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Mihaela S StefanFrom the Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, Division of Hospital Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, and Biological Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Baystate Medical Center · US

Funding

Comparing Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory FailureK01HL114631 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI STEFAN, MIHAELA S · 2013 to 2016
$565k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL114631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStudies have found that recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) accompany up to 31% of index computed tomography (CT) scans. In this study we assessed the frequency with which recommendations are accepted by the referring physician and the impact of AI on case management.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of all index CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis performed on adult inpatients during a 1-month period at a tertiary medical center. Each radiology report was examined for mention of RAI. We used a standardized abstraction tool to review medical records for the indication for the RAI (related to original diagnosis vs incidental finding), the clinician's rationale for pursuing or discarding the RAI, and the impact of the AI on the inpatient treatment plan.

resultsAmong the 430 scans reviewed, most (57.7%) were of the abdomen/pelvis. RAI was recommended in 67 cases (odds ratio [OR] 15.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.4-19.3) and AI was completed in 24 of 67 cases (35.8%). Factors associated with a recommendation for AI were the presence of an incidental finding (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-6.8) and verbal communication of the result to the ordering provider (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.23-3.5). When performed, AI altered the treatment plan 75% (18/24) of the time. Among the 43 cases in which AI was not performed, 34.1% were deferred to outpatient, 13.6% underwent alternative clinical intervention, and 13.6% were judged unnecessary by the primary team. No rationale was documented in the chart for the remaining 38.6%.

conclusionsDespite concerns about autoreferral by radiologists for AI studies, we found a lower rate than in many prior studies, which may reflect a change in clinical practice. One-third of these recommendations were implemented and verbal communication was strongly associated with the likelihood of second image ordering. In the majority of the cases, the AI affected patient management. Based on these findings, radiologists should consider calling the ordering provider to increase the likelihood that the primary team will follow their recommendations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'RadiologistsReferral and ConsultationTertiary Care CentersTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29197311
PMCPMC6943749
OpenAlexW2771624174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.