Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29197173›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2018

Evaluation of data sources and approaches for estimation of influenza-associated mortality in India.

Venkatesh Vinayak Narayan, Angela Danielle Iuliano, Katherine Roguski, Partha Haldar, Siddhartha Saha, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas, Shashi Kant, Sanjay Zodpey, Chandrakant S Pandav, Seema Jain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in measuring influenza burden of disease.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Venkatesh Vinayak NarayanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-7804
Angela Danielle IulianoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katherine RoguskiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Partha HaldarCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Siddhartha SahaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7494-267X
Vishnubhatla SreenivasCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shashi KantCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay ZodpeyIndian Institute of Public Health, New Delhi, India.
Chandrakant S PandavCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema JainCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, New Delhi, India.
Anand KrishnanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9173-7811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo estimates of influenza-associated mortality exist for India.

objectiveTo evaluate national mortality and viral surveillance data from India for assessing their appropriateness in estimating influenza-associated mortality using varied analytic approaches.

methodsWe reviewed influenza virus surveillance data from a national influenza surveillance network. We also reviewed national mortality data from Civil Registration System (CRS), Medical Certification of Cause of Death (MCCD) and the Sample Registration System (SRS). We compared and scored the different sources of mortality data using specific criteria, including the process of cause of death assignment, sample size, proportion of ill-defined deaths, representativeness and availability of time series data. Each of these 5 parameters was scored on a scale from 1 to 5. To evaluate how to generate an influenza-associated mortality estimate for India, we also reviewed 4 methodologic approaches to assess the appropriateness of their assumptions and requirements for these data sets.

resultsThe influenza virus surveillance data included year-round sample testing for influenza virus and was found to be suitable for influenza mortality estimation modelling. Based on scoring for the 5 mortality data criteria, the SRS data had the highest score with 20 of 25 possible score, whereas MCCD and CRS scored 16 and 12, respectively. The SRS which used verbal autopsy survey methods was determined to be nationally representative and thus adequate for estimating influenza-associated mortality. Evaluation of the modelling methods demonstrated that Poisson regression, risk difference and mortality multiplier methods could be applied to the Indian setting.

conclusionDespite significant challenges, it is possible to estimate influenza-associated mortality in India.

Indexed as

Disease NotificationHumansIndiaInfluenza, HumanPopulation SurveillanceRegistriesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsIndiainfluenzamortality

Identifiers

PMID29197173
PMCPMC5818338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.