ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2018
The common rate control account of prediction motion.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in the practical application of the Vienna test system for assessing cognitive functions in the general, athletic and clinical populations: a global scoping review of experimental and observational studies.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Atypical Time to Contact Estimation in Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Improving women's team performance on corners through video training and ball trajectory anticipation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Prediction of time to contact under perceptual and contextual uncertainties.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The effect of background information and motion speed on the performance of TTC estimation.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Are predictive saccades linked to the processing of peripheral information?Psychological research · 2023Article
- Application of a Reactive Agility Training Program Using Light-Based Stimuli to Enhance the Physical and Cognitive Performance of Car Racing Drivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Sports medicine - open · 2022Article
- The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In prediction-motion (PM) tasks, people judge the current position of an occluded moving object. People can also judge the current number on an occluded digital counter or the current colour of an occluded colour-change display. These abilities imply that we can run mental simulations at a chosen speed, even without feedback from the senses. There is increasing evidence that the brain has a common rate control module for pacing all such dynamic mental simulations. The common rate control account of PM has more explanatory power than alternative accounts which emphasise the role of mental imagery or the oculomotor system. Finally, neuroimaging work suggests that the common rate controller is a part of a core timing network that incorporates basal ganglia circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29197050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.