Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29197027›Full record

ReviewIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2017

Best practices for detecting and mitigating the risk of cell culture contaminants.

Raymond W Nims, Paul J Price

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antiobesity Drug Discovery Research:Current drug targets · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Best practices for authenticating cell lines.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raymond W NimsRMC Pharmaceutical Solutions, Inc., 1851 Lefthand Circle, Suite A, Longmont, CO, 80501, USA. rnims@rmcpharma.com.
Paul J PriceCell and Media Solutions, 953 Casseque Province, Mount Pleasant, SC, 29464, USA.
RMC Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of biological and chemical contaminants can adversely impact cells in culture, ranging from outright destruction of the culture, mutation, phenotypic changes to relatively minor changes in morphology, or growth rate. There are various approaches to detecting and mitigating the risk of biological or microbial contaminants in cell cultures, and these are discussed in this article. Chemical contaminants typically arise from improper handling or sourcing of cell culture reagents, glassware, or other types of consumables. These and other sources of chemical contaminants of cell cultures are discussed. The occurrence of chemical contamination is mitigated through adherence to best practices in sourcing and handling of such materials and by avoiding the use of volatile solvents within incubators that are used for maintaining cell cultures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCulture MediaDetergentsEndotoxinsFree RadicalsHumansMetals, HeavyMicrobiological TechniquesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaDetergentsEndotoxinsFree RadicalsMetals, HeavyBiological contaminationDetergentEndotoxinHeavy metalMicrobial contaminationMycobacteria contaminationMycoplasma contaminationViral contamination

Identifiers

PMID29197027
OpenAlexW2775561118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.