Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29196958›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2017

Surgical management of complicated rectovaginal fistulas and the role of omentoplasty.

E Schloericke, M Zimmermann, C Benecke, T Laubert, R Meyer, H-P Bruch, R Bouchard, T Keck, M Hoffmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E SchloerickeDepartment of Surgery, WKK Heide, Heide, Germany.
M ZimmermannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
C BeneckeDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
T LaubertDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
R MeyerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
H-P BruchDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
R BouchardDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
T KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
M HoffmannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. martin.hoffmann@uksh.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with rectovaginal fistulas have a significantly reduced quality of life. Therefore, surgical therapy is often needed even in palliative cases. The aim of the present study was to perform an analysis of the results of the different treatment options available today.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent treatment for rectovaginal fistulas at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Department of Surgery, WKK Heide, between January 2000 and September 2016. Complication and recurrence rate were retrospectively evaluated. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range 3-36 months).

resultsDuring the observation period, 58 patients underwent surgery (53 curative, 5 palliative) for rectovaginal fistulas. All patients who underwent curative surgery had an omentoplasty, and 39 of 53 (73.6%) patients underwent a resection. Thirty of 39 (77.0%) resections were low anterior resection, while non-continence-preserving resection included subtotal colectomy (n = 5), pelvic exenteration (n = 2), and proctectomy (n = 2). The fistulas were mainly secondary to inflammatory bowel disease (n = 18) or diverticulitis (n = 13), while 19 fistulas were a complication of different cancers or precancerous lesions. The median follow-up time was 13 months (range 6-36). Four patients (6.9%) had fistula recurrence (3 recurrences after low anterior resection, 1 after primary fistula closure). The mortality rate was 6.9% (n = 4).

conclusionsNon-resecting methods should be used only in uncomplicated fistulas. Rectovaginal fistulas secondary to inflammatory or malignant disease mostly require extensive therapy. Omentoplasty is effective for the treatment of both high and low rectovaginal fistulas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyColitis, UlcerativeColostomyCrohn DiseaseDiverticulitisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOmentumPelvic ExenterationFistula recurrenceInflammatory bowel diseaseOmentoplastyRectovaginal fistulaTherapy options

Identifiers

PMID29196958
OpenAlexW2775394098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.