ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018
The feasibility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in forensic medicine illustrated by the example of morphine.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphine concentrations in fatalities after palliative treatment of acute burn injury.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of codeine in different CYP2D6 phenotypes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Review
- Data Digitizing: Accurate and Precise Data Extraction for Quantitative Systems Pharmacology and Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2020Review
- PBPK Model of Morphine Incorporating Developmental Changes in Hepatic OCT1 and UGT2B7 Proteins to Explain the Variability in Clearances in Neonates and Small Infants.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In forensic medicine, expert opinion is often required concerning dose and time of intake of a substance, especially in the context of fatal intoxications. In the present case, a 98-year-old man died 4 days after admission to a hospital due to a femur neck fracture following a domestic fall in his retirement home. As he had obtained high morphine doses in the context of palliative therapy and a confusion of his supplemental magnesium tablets with a diuretic by the care retirement home was suspected by the relatives, a comprehensive postmortem examination was performed. Forensic toxicological GC- and LC-MS analyses revealed, besides propofol, ketamine, and a metamizole metabolite in blood and urine, toxic blood morphine concentrations of approximately 3 mg/l in femoral and 5 mg/l in heart blood as well as 2, 7, and 10 mg/kg morphine in brain, liver, and lung, respectively. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed and applied to examine whether the morphine concentrations were (i) in agreement with the morphine doses documented in the clinical records or (ii) due to an excessive morphine administration. PBPK model simulations argue against an overdosing of morphine. The immediate cause of death was respiratory and cardiovascular failure due to pneumonia following a fall, femur neck fracture, and immobilization accompanied by a high and probably toxic concentration of morphine, attributable to the administration under palliative care conditions. The presented case indicates that PBPK modeling can be a useful tool in forensic medicine, especially in question of a possible drug overdosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.