ArticleIntensive care medicine2018
The 10 false beliefs in adult critical care nephrology.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of High-Impact Articles in Critical Care Nephrology.Blood purification · 2024Pooled it
- Construction and evaluation of prediction model for renal function recovery in acute kidney injury patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy based on machine learning algorithms.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- An update review on hemodynamic instability in renal replacement therapy patients.International urology and nephrology · 2023Review
- Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists COVID-19 Rapid Response: Guidelines for Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Children.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- CSN COVID-19 Rapid Review Program: Management of Acute Kidney Injury.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Mechanisms for hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29196792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.