ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018
Comparison of dual mobility cup and other surgical construts used for three hundred and sixty two first time hip revisions due to recurrent dislocations: five year results from Lithuanian arthroplasty register.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Modular dual mobility articulation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty: lights and shadows.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Dual-mobility cups could yield lesser infections than conventional cups: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.International orthopaedics · 2021Pooled it
- Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Review
- Cage Augmentation of the Retained Acetabular Shell with a Dual Mobility Cup using the Double Socket Technique.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Removing Cemented Dual Mobility Liners From Acetabular Components: A Technical Tip for a Challenging Surgical Problem.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Single center evaluation of outcomes of modular dual mobility liners during revision total hip arthroplasty: A five-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty: Should It Be Revised Using Dual Mobility Implants? A Retrospective Analysis from the R.I.P.O. Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- A prospective osseointegration retrieval analysis of second generation cementless shells.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Review
- Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis.SICOT-J · 2021Article
- The Lefèvre retentive cup compared with the dual mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision for dislocation.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- A comparative study about the incidence of dislocation and peri-prosthetic fracture between dual mobility versus standard cups after primary total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Dual-mobility cups in revision acetabular reconstructions: Short-term outcomes in high-risk patients for instability.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2019Article
- Cementation of a monoblock dual mobility bearing in a newly implanted porous revision acetabular component in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2019Article
- Dual mobility in hip arthroplasty: What evidence do we need?Bone & joint research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecently, there has been increasing interest in the use of dual mobility systems in the treatment of hip instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the re-revision rate of dual mobility cup compared to different surgical concepts when used for first-time hip revisions due to recurrent dislocations.
methodsThe data were derived from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. For survival analysis, we used both re-revision for all reasons and for dislocations as an end-point. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the influence of various covariates (age, gender, and implant concept).
resultsA total of 1388 revisions were recorded from 2011 to 2015, of which 362 were performed due to recurrent dislocation. Of the revisions, 247 were performed using dual mobility cups, while 115 were performed using a variety of other surgical constructs including constrained acetabular cups, conventional cups, femoral head exchanges, stem exchanges or anti-luxation rings. There were 27 re-revisions of which 15 were for additional dislocations. There were only 2% re-revisions due to dislocation with dual mobility vs 9% when using other surgical constructs. Cox regression adjusting for age and gender showed that in the short-term, dual mobility cup had a lower risk of revision due to dislocation as well as for all reasons compared to the other surgical constructs.
conclusionIn revision of total hip arthroplasties for dislocation, significantly lower short-term re-revision rate was observed for patients revised with dual mobility cup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29196791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.