ArticlePediatric cardiology2018
Acute Pulmonary Vasodilator Testing and Long-Term Clinical Course in Segmental Pulmonary Vascular Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right Ventricular Function Improves With Pulmonary Vasodilator Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension and Multivessel Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in a Single Center Cohort.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in Children: A Programmatic Approach Employing Primary and Anatomic Therapy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Intervening with the Nitric Oxide Pathway to Alleviate Pulmonary Hypertension in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Results of acute pulmonary vasodilator testing (AVT) and the outcome of medical therapy have not been described in patients with segmental pulmonary vascular disease (SPVD). We sought to compare the pulmonary vasodilatory effects of oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and diltiazem, and to describe the clinical course of patients with SPVD and pulmonary hypertension. A retrospective review of 16 patients with pulmonary hypertension and SPVD involving 2-3 major lung segments who underwent AVT between January 2000 and December 2015 was performed. Baseline hemodynamic measurements were obtained with patients breathing ≤ 30% oxygen. AVT was performed using 100% oxygen, 100% oxygen with 20 ppm nitric oxide, 21-35% oxygen, and 21-35% oxygen with intravenous diltiazem. The events associated with their long-term care were described. Nine of 16 patients were acutely responsive during AVT using the Sitbon criteria. The change in mean pulmonary artery pressure with oxygen or oxygen with nitric oxide (19 ± 12 mmHg) was significantly greater than the change with diltiazem (7 ± 5 mmHg). Pulmonary vasodilator therapy was initiated or escalated after AVT in 12 patients. Five patients subsequently experienced a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure or normalization in B-type natriuretic peptide. Three patients experienced adverse events associated with therapy. The actuarial survival was 94% over a period of 1-20 years. This study suggests that AVT can be used to identify patients with SPVD who are reactive to oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and diltiazem. Clinical improvement was temporally associated with pulmonary vasodilator therapy in some patients with few adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.