Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29196769›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

CTG18.1 Expansion in TCF4 Among African Americans With Fuchs' Corneal Dystrophy.

Allen O Eghrari, Sina Vahedi, Natalie A Afshari, S Amer Riazuddin, John D Gottsch

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allen O EghrariWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Sina VahediWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Natalie A AfshariShiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
S Amer RiazuddinWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
John D GottschWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Wilmer Inst. Mentored Clinical Research Scholar ProgramK12EY015025 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI James T Handa, Harry Alan Quigley · 2003 to 2026
$8.6M
Genetics of Fuchs Corneal DystrophyR01EY016835 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOTTSCH, JOHN D · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY015025NEI NIH HHS L30 EY024746NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Studies of Fuchs' dystrophy have largely focused on individuals of European origin. Characterization of disease among African Americans is required to ensure prognostic factors and therapeutic approaches are applicable across diverse patient populations. Methods: We assessed all self-reported black and white patients aged older than 40 years at a tertiary care institution with a diagnosis of cataract over a 3-year period for concurrent diagnosis of Fuchs' dystrophy. Affected patients in a longitudinal cohort were invited to provide a blood sample from which we extracted genomic DNA. The CTG18.1 trinucleotide repeat length was determined using a two-step, triplet repeat primed PCR protocol. Expansion was defined as >40 CTG repeats. Demographic information, including race, was documented. Results: Of 59,365 self-reported black and white adults who presented for cataract evaluation, the odds ratio of presenting with Fuchs' dystrophy among black compared to white patients was 0.6992 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6210-0.7872). A total of 60 black and 549 white patients with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy enrolled in the longitudinal study, of which 21 (35.0%) black and 343 (62.5%) white patients demonstrated trinucleotide repeat expansion, a significant difference (P = 7.7 × 10-5). In a multivariable linear regression model, repeat expansion but not race was significantly associated with mean clinical grading of severity. Conclusions: Black patients with Fuchs' dystrophy were less likely than white patients to demonstrate CTG18.1 allele expansion. The data contribute to our understanding of population differences in clinical presentation, and highlight the need for considering diversity of patient populations in clinical research.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticAllelesDNAFollow-Up StudiesFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGenotypeHumansIncidencePolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportTime FactorsTranscription Factor 4Trinucleotide Repeat ExpansionDNATCF4 protein, humanTranscription Factor 4

Identifiers

PMID29196769
PMCPMC5710628
OpenAlexW2774233914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.