Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29196738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China.

Xiue Ma, Yunqian Wang, Lingtong Shan, Zhengqiang Cang, Chang Gu, Nianyi Qu, Qifan Li, Jun Li, Zhenhua Wang, Yangyang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The Early Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin in Pneumonia After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiue MaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yunqian WangResearch Center for Translational Medicine, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lingtong ShanThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhengqiang CangThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chang GuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Nianyi QuCollege of information technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Qifan LiThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jun LiResearch Center for Translational Medicine, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhenhua WangCollege of information technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China. zh-wang@shou.edu.cn.
Yangyang ZhangResearch Center for Translational Medicine, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhangyangyang_wy@vip.sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From January 2010 to December 2016, 1616 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were evaluated for their predicted mortality according to the online Sino System for Coronary Operative Risk Evaluation (SinoSCORE), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk evaluation system. The calibration and discrimination in the total and in the subsets were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics and by the C statistics respectively, to evaluate the efficiency of the three risk evaluation systems. The realized mortality was 1.92% (31/1616). The predictive mortality of SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system were 1.35%, 1.74% and 1.05%, respectively. SinoSCORE achieved best discrimination. When grouping by risk, SinoSCORE also achieved the best discrimination in high-risk group, followed by STS risk evaluation system and EuroSCORE II while SinoSCORE and EuroSCORE II had excellent performance in low-risk group. In terms of calibration, SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system all achieved positive calibrations (H-L: P > 0.05) in the overall population and grouped subsets. SinoSCORE achieved good predictive efficiency in East China patients undergoing isolated CABG and showed no compromise when compared with EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsResearch DesignRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29196738
PMCPMC5711857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.