Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29196637›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Influence of the electrolyte's pH on the properties of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating on additively manufactured Ti64 alloy.

Alina Vladescu, Diana M Vranceanu, Slawek Kulesza, Alexey N Ivanov, Mirosław Bramowicz, Alexander S Fedonnikov, Mariana Braic, Igor A Norkin, Andrey Koptyug, Maria O Kurtukova and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Alina VladescuNational Institute for Optoelectronics, Department for Advanced Surface Processing and Analysis by Vacuum Technologies, 409 Atomistilor St., Magurele, RO77125, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-4541
Diana M VranceanuUniversity Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Spl. Independentei, Bucharest, RO60042, Romania.
Slawek KuleszaWarmia and Mazury University in Olsztyn, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Słoneczna 54, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Alexey N IvanovScientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo st., Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Mirosław BramowiczWarmia and Mazury University in Olsztyn, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Słoneczna 54, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Alexander S FedonnikovScientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo st., Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Mariana BraicNational Institute for Optoelectronics, Department for Advanced Surface Processing and Analysis by Vacuum Technologies, 409 Atomistilor St., Magurele, RO77125, Romania.
Igor A NorkinScientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo st., Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Andrey KoptyugAdditive Manufacturing Group, Sports Tech Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Akademigatan 1, Östersund, 831 25, Sweden.
Maria O KurtukovaDepartment of Histology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 112 Bolshaya Kazachia st., Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Mihaela DinuNational Institute for Optoelectronics, Department for Advanced Surface Processing and Analysis by Vacuum Technologies, 409 Atomistilor St., Magurele, RO77125, Romania.
Iulian PanaNational Institute for Optoelectronics, Department for Advanced Surface Processing and Analysis by Vacuum Technologies, 409 Atomistilor St., Magurele, RO77125, Romania.
Maria A SurmenevaNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 43, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Roman A SurmenevNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 43, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Cosmin M CotrutUniversity Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Spl. Independentei, Bucharest, RO60042, Romania. cosmin.cotrut@upb.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-7485
National Research Tomsk State University · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUNational Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics · ROUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLMid Sweden University · SESaratov State Medical University · RUUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Properties of the hydroxyapatite obtained by electrochemical assisted deposition (ED) are dependent on several factors including deposition temperature, electrolyte pH and concentrations, applied potential. All of these factors directly influence the morphology, stoichiometry, crystallinity, electrochemical behaviour, and particularly the coating thickness. Coating structure together with surface micro- and nano-scale topography significantly influence early stages of the implant bio-integration. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of pH modification on the morphology, corrosion behaviour and in vitro bioactivity and in vivo biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite prepared by ED on the additively manufactured Ti64 samples. The coatings prepared in the electrolytes with pH = 6 have predominantly needle like morphology with the dimensions in the nanometric scale (~30 nm). Samples coated at pH = 6 demonstrated higher protection efficiency against the corrosive attack as compared to the ones coated at pH = 5 (~93% against 89%). The in vitro bioactivity results indicated that both coatings have a greater capacity of biomineralization, compared to the uncoated Ti64. Somehow, the coating deposited at pH = 6 exhibited good corrosion behaviour and high biomineralization ability. In vivo subcutaneous implantation of the coated samples into the white rats for up to 21 days with following histological studies showed no serious inflammatory process.

Identifiers

PMID29196637
PMCPMC5711918
OpenAlexW2770143273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.