Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29196032›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2018

Current methods and limitations for longitudinal fMRI analysis across development.

Tara Madhyastha, Matthew Peverill, Natalie Koh, Connor McCabe, John Flournoy, Kate Mills, Kevin King, Jennifer Pfeifer, Katie A McLaughlin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Longitudinal regression of covariance matrix outcomes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Associations of delay discounting and drinking trajectories from ages 14 to 22.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara MadhyasthaRadiology, University of Washington, United States. Electronic address: madhyt@uw.edu.
Matthew PeverillPsychology, University of Washington, United States.
Natalie KohRadiology, University of Washington, United States.
Connor McCabePsychology, University of Washington, United States.
John FlournoyPsychology, University of Oregon, United States.
Kate MillsPsychology, University of Oregon, United States.
Kevin KingPsychology, University of Washington, United States.
Jennifer PfeiferPsychology, University of Oregon, United States.
Katie A McLaughlinPsychology, University of Washington, United States.

Funding

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Child Trauma and the Development of Neural Systems Underlying Emotion RegulationR01MH103291 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Deprivation and Threat: Dimensions of Early Experience and Neural DevelopmentR01MH106482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Puberty, neural systems for social processes, and early adolescent mental health: A longitudinal neuroimaging studyR01MH107418 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PFEIFER, JENNIFER HOPE · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Intrinsic Activity and Cognition in Parkinson Disease Assessed by Simultaneous fMRI/EEGR01NS099199 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRABOWSKI, THOMAS J. · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103291NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106482NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107418NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is remarkably plastic. The brain changes dramatically across development, with ongoing functional development continuing well into the third decade of life and substantial changes occurring again in older age. Dynamic changes in brain function are thought to underlie the innumerable changes in cognition, emotion, and behavior that occur across development. The brain also changes in response to experience, which raises important questions about how the environment influences the developing brain. Longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies are an essential means of understanding these developmental changes and their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral correlates. This paper provides an overview of common statistical models of longitudinal change applicable to developmental cognitive neuroscience, and a review of the functionality provided by major software packages for longitudinal fMRI analysis. We demonstrate that there are important developmental questions that cannot be answered using available software. We propose alternative approaches for addressing problems that are commonly faced in modeling developmental change with fMRI data.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingDevelopmental changeFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)General Linear ModelLongitudinal modelingStructural Equation Modeling

Identifiers

PMID29196032
PMCPMC5963980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.