ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2017
Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions.
Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea: clinical outcome of 38 patients after interdisciplinary treatment in a single institution.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Radiotherapy for glioma in the AI era: current applications and future prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Revolutionizing Glioblastoma Treatment: A Comprehensive Overview of Modern Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review of Recent Improvements in Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Adjuvant proton beam therapy in patients with grade 2 meningiomas.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Review
- Long-term outcomes of fractionated proton beam therapy for benign or radiographic intracranial meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Treatment Strategies and Current Results of Petroclival Meningiomas.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Bilateral paediatric optic nerve sheath meningioma.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Flourish of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Review
- Enhancement of Therapies for Glioblastoma (GBM) Using Nanoparticle-based Delivery Systems.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Review
- MDM2/X Inhibitors as Radiosensitizers for Glioblastoma Targeted Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Impact of Hypoxia on Carbon Ion Therapy in Glioblastoma Cells: Modulation by LET and Hypoxia-Dependent Genes.Cancers · 2020Article
- Review of Atypical and Anaplastic Meningiomas: Classification, Molecular Biology, and Management.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of gliomas: a review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Review
- Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas.Neuro-oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, respectively. Proton beam therapy (PBT) for meningiomas displays high rates of long-term local control, low rates of symptomatic deterioration, along with the potential for safe dose-escalation in select (but not necessarily routine) cases. PBT is also associated with low adverse events and maintenance of functional outcomes, which have implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures going forward. Data on carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) are limited; existing series describe virtually no high-grade toxicities and high local control. Regarding the few available data on low-grade gliomas, PBT provides opportunities to dose-escalate while affording no increase of severe toxicities, along with maintaining appropriate quality of life. Although dose-escalation for low-grade disease has been less frequently performed than for glioblastoma, PBT and CIRT continue to be utilized for the latter, and also have potential for safer re-irradiation of high-grade gliomas. For both neoplasms, the impact of superior dosimetric profiles with endpoints such as neurocognitive decline and neurologic funcionality, are also discussed to the extent of requiring more data to support the utility of particle therapy. Caveats to these data are also described, such as the largely retrospective nature of the available studies, patient selection, and heterogeneity in patient population as well as treatment (including mixed photon/particle treatment). Nevertheless, multiple prospective trials (which may partially attenuate those concerns) are also discussed. In light of the low quantity and quality of available data, major questions remain regarding economic concerns as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.