Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29195499›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2017

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Kazutoshi Fujita, Kei Taneishi, Teruo Inamoto, Yu Ishizuya, Shingo Takada, Masao Tsujihata, Go Tanigawa, Noriko Minato, Shigeaki Nakazawa, Tsuyoshi Takada and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Trop-2 in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  10. Expression of Nectin-4 and PD-L1 in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. kazu.fujita2@gmail.com.
Kei TaneishiDepartment of Clinical System Onco-Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Yu IshizuyaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Shingo TakadaDepartment of Urology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masao TsujihataDepartment of Urology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Go TanigawaDepartment of Urology, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Noriko MinatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeaki NakazawaDepartment of Urology, Nishinomiya Prefectural Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakadaDepartment of Urology, Minoh Municipal Hospital, Minoh, Japan.
Toshichika IwanishiDepartment of Urology, Higashi Osaka General Medical Center, Higashi-, Osaka, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yasushi OkunoDepartment of Clinical System Onco-Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Haruhito AzumaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Nonomura NorioDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPKyoto University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPHigashi Osaka City General Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital · JPMinoh City Hospital · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPOsaka Rosai Hospital · JPSumitomo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purposes of this study were to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improved the prognosis of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)and to identify the patients who benefited from AC.

methodsAmong a multi-center database of 1014 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC, 344 patients with ≥ pT3 or the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were included. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared by the log-rank test. Each patient's probability of receiving AC depending on the covariates in each group was estimated by logistic regression models. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors for selecting patients for AC, and log-rank tests were applied to these propensity score-matched cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify the variables with significant interaction with AC. Variables included age, pT category, LVI, tumor grade, ECOG performance status and low sodium or hemoglobin score, which we reported to be a prognostic factor of UTUC.

resultsOf the 344 patients, 241 (70%) had received RNU only and 103 (30%) had received RNU+AC. The median follow-up period was 32 (range 1-184) months. Overall, AC did not improve CSS (P = 0.12). After propensity score matching, the 5-year CSS was 69.0% in patients with RNU+AC versus 58.9% in patients with RNU alone (P = 0.030). Subgroup analyses of survival were performed to identify the patients who benefitted from AC. Subgroups of patients with low preoperative serum sodium (≤ 140 mEq/ml) or hemoglobin levels below the normal limit benefitted from AC (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.61, P = 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with normal sodium and normal hemoglobin levels, 5-year CSS was 77.7% in patients with RNU+AC versus 80.2% in patients with RNU alone (P = 0.84). In contrast, in the subgroup of patients with low sodium or low hemoglobin levels, 5-year CSS was 71.0% in patients with RNU+AC versus 38.5% in patients with RNU alone (P < 0.001).

conclusionsHigh-risk UTUC patients, especially subgroups of patients with lower sodium and hemoglobin levels, could benefit from AC after RNU.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumAdjuvant chemotherapyHemoglobinSodiumUpper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29195499
PMCPMC5710092
OpenAlexW2771296166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.