Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29195272›Full record

ArticleBiomacromolecules2018

Multivalent Antimicrobial Polymer Nanoparticles Target Mycobacteria and Gram-Negative Bacteria by Distinct Mechanisms.

Sarah-Jane Richards, Klea Isufi, Laura E Wilkins, Julia Lipecki, Elizabeth Fullam, Matthew I Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomacromolecules, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Precision Design of Antimicrobial Surfaces.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Photochemical "In-Air" Combinatorial Discovery of Antimicrobial Co-polymers.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah-Jane RichardsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Klea IsufiSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Laura E WilkinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Julia LipeckiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth FullamSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Matthew I GibsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-1278

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017982/1European Research Council 638661Wellcome Trust 104193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance to traditional small-molecule drugs, cationic antimicrobial polymers are appealing targets. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a particular problem, with multi- and total drug resistance spreading and more than a billion latent infections globally. This study reports nanoparticles bearing variable densities of poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) and the unexpected and distinct mechanisms of action this multivalent presentation imparts against Escherichia coli versus Mycobacterium smegmatis (model of M. tuberculosis), leading to killing or growth inhibition, respectively. A convergent "grafting to" synthetic strategy was used to assemble a 50-member nanoparticle library, and using a high-throughput screen identified that only the smallest (2 nm) particles were stable in both saline and complex cell media. Compared with the linear polymers, the nanoparticles displayed two- and eight-fold enhancements in antimicrobial activity against M. smegmatis and E. coli, respectively. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that the antimicrobial particles were bactericidal against E. coli due to rapid disruption of the cell membranes. Conversely, against M. smegmatis the particles did not lyse the cell membrane but rather had a bacteriostatic effect. These results demonstrate that to develop new polymeric antituberculars the widely assumed, broad spectrum, membrane-disrupting mechanism of polycations must be re-evaluated. It is clear that synthetic nanomaterials can engage in more complex interactions with mycobacteria, which we hypothesize is due to the unique cell envelope at the surface of these bacteria.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsEscherichia coliMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium smegmatisMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymersAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID29195272
PMCPMC5761047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.