Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29195013›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2018

Effect of bacterial growth rate on bacteriophage population growth rate.

Dominik Nabergoj, Petra Modic, Aleš Podgornik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Vancomycin and phage COP-80B combination therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis periprosthetic joint infections: a preclinical mouse study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik NabergojCenter of Excellence for Biosensors, Instrumentation and Process Control - COBIK, Ajdovščina, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-3080-737X
Petra ModicFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleš PodgornikCenter of Excellence for Biosensors, Instrumentation and Process Control - COBIK, Ajdovščina, Slovenia.
University of Ljubljana · SICentre of Excellence for Biosensors, Instrumentation and Process Control · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to understand how physiological state of the host influence propagation of bacteriophages (phages), due to the potential higher phage production needs in the future. In our study, we tried to elucidate the effect of bacterial growth rate on adsorption constant (δ), latent period (L), burst size (b), and bacteriophage population growth rate (λ). As a model system, a well-studied phage T4 and Escherichia coli K-12 as a host was used. Bacteria were grown in a continuous culture operating at dilution rates in the range between 0.06 and 0.98 hr

Indexed as

Population GrowthBacteriophage T4Escherichia coli K12Viral Plaque AssayVirus Latencybacterial growth ratebacteriophage population growth ratechemostatE. coli K-12phage growth parametersphage T4

Identifiers

PMID29195013
PMCPMC5911998
OpenAlexW2772066286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.