Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29194590›Full record

Observational studyClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2018

Effectiveness of Statins as Primary Prevention in People With Different Cardiovascular Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Maria Garcia-Gil, Marc Comas-Cufí, Jordi Blanch, Ruth Martí, Anna Ponjoan, Lia Alves-Cabratosa, Irene Petersen, Jaume Marrugat, Roberto Elosua, María Grau and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Garcia-GilInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Marc Comas-CufíInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Jordi BlanchInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Ruth MartíInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Anna PonjoanInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Lia Alves-CabratosaInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.
Irene PetersenDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College of London, UK.
Jaume MarrugatRegistre Gironí del Cor Research Group (REGICOR) and Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Roberto ElosuaRegistre Gironí del Cor Research Group (REGICOR) and Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
María GrauRegistre Gironí del Cor Research Group (REGICOR) and Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Rafel RamosInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain; ISV Research Group, Research Unit in Primary Care, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to analyze statin effectiveness in a general population with differing levels of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Patients (35-74 years) without previous cardiovascular disease were included and stratified according to 10-year CHD risk (<5%, 5-7.4%, 7.5-9.9%, and 10-19.9%). New users were categorized according to their medical possession ratio (MPR). The main outcome was atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke). In adherent patients (MPR 70%), statin treatment decreased ASCVD risk across the range of coronary risk (from 16-30%). The 5-year number needed to treat (NNT) was 470 and 204 in the risk categories <5% and 5-7.4%, respectively, and 75 and 62 in the 7.5-9.9% category than in the 10-19.9% category, respectively. Statin therapy should remain a priority in patients at high 10-year CHD risk (10-19.9%). Most patients with intermediate risk could benefit from statin treatment, but the treatment decision should focus on the net benefit, safety, and patient preference, given the higher NNT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDyslipidemiasFemaleHealth StatusHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipidsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID29194590
PMCPMC6174924

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.