Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29194461›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation and validation of commercial antibodies for the detection of Shb.

Güliz Vanli, Alvaro Cuesta-Marban, Christian Widmann

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Güliz VanliDepartment of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alvaro Cuesta-MarbanDepartment of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian WidmannDepartment of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-0363
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies are among the most important tools for protein detection but, prior to their usage, proper validation of their appropriateness for given applications is required. The utility of an antibody depends on its sensitivity and specificity. We studied these two aspects in a panel of commercial antibodies against Shb, a platform protein involved in receptor tyrosine kinase signalling, but the function of which is still incompletely understood. Several of the antibodies showed shortcomings or were not acceptable for detection of the endogenous protein. The few that could detect Shb were doing so in either western blotting or immunoprecipitation experiments but a given antibody could not work in both applications. This article provides a resource for the available molecular tools that can be used in future research on Shb.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntibodiesBlotting, WesternHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoprecipitationProto-Oncogene ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntibodiesProto-Oncogene ProteinsSHB protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29194461
PMCPMC5711028
OpenAlexW2772251667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.