Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29194457›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.

Vincent Jacob, Christelle Monsempès, Jean-Pierre Rospars, Jean-Baptiste Masson, Philippe Lucas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Adaptive temporal processing of odor stimuli.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Odor Stimuli: Not Just Chemical Identity.Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tuning Insect Odorant Receptors.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent JacobInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, INRA, route de St Cyr, Versailles, France.
Christelle MonsempèsInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, INRA, route de St Cyr, Versailles, France.
Jean-Pierre RosparsInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, INRA, route de St Cyr, Versailles, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0797-5153
Jean-Baptiste MassonDecision and Bayesian Computation, Pasteur Institute, CNRS UMR 3571, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Philippe LucasInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, INRA, route de St Cyr, Versailles, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-8248
AgroParisTech · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-distance olfactory search behaviors depend on odor detection dynamics. Due to turbulence, olfactory signals travel as bursts of variable concentration and spacing and are characterized by long-tail distributions of odor/no-odor events, challenging the computing capacities of olfactory systems. How animals encode complex olfactory scenes to track the plume far from the source remains unclear. Here we focus on the coding of the plume temporal dynamics in moths. We compare responses of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) to sequences of pheromone stimuli either with white-noise patterns or with realistic turbulent temporal structures simulating a large range of distances (8 to 64 m) from the odor source. For the first time, we analyze what information is extracted by the olfactory system at large distances from the source. Neuronal responses are analyzed using linear-nonlinear models fitted with white-noise stimuli and used for predicting responses to turbulent stimuli. We found that neuronal firing rate is less correlated with the dynamic odor time course when distance to the source increases because of improper coding during long odor and no-odor events that characterize large distances. Rapid adaptation during long puffs does not preclude however the detection of puff transitions in PNs. Individual PNs but not individual ORNs encode the onset and offset of odor puffs for any temporal structure of stimuli. A higher spontaneous firing rate coupled to an inhibition phase at the end of PN responses contributes to this coding property. This allows PNs to decode the temporal structure of the odor plume at any distance to the source, an essential piece of information moths can use in their tracking behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetitive BehaviorArthropod AntennaeComputational BiologyMaleMothsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPheromonesPheromones

Identifiers

PMID29194457
PMCPMC5736211
OpenAlexW2747076155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.