ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Stimulus duration encoding occurs early in the moth olfactory pathway.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Olfactory receptor neurons generate multiple response motifs, increasing coding space dimensionality.eLife · 2023Article
- Article
- Sensing complementary temporal features of odor signals enhances navigation of diverse turbulent plumes.eLife · 2022Article
- Non-synaptic interactions between olfactory receptor neurons, a possible key feature of odor processing in flies.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Effects of Multi-Component Backgrounds of Volatile Plant Compounds on Moth Pheromone Perception.Insects · 2021Article
- Adaptive temporal processing of odor stimuli.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Adaptive integrate-and-fire model reproduces the dynamics of olfactory receptor neuron responses in a moth.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Article
- Odor Stimuli: Not Just Chemical Identity.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Moth olfactory receptor neurons adjust their encoding efficiency to temporal statistics of pheromone fluctuations.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Inhibitory Pathways for Processing the Temporal Structure of Sensory Signals in the Insect Brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Review
- Current Source Density Analysis of Electroantennogram Recordings: A Tool for Mapping the Olfactory Response in an Insect Antenna.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Tuning Insect Odorant Receptors.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-distance olfactory search behaviors depend on odor detection dynamics. Due to turbulence, olfactory signals travel as bursts of variable concentration and spacing and are characterized by long-tail distributions of odor/no-odor events, challenging the computing capacities of olfactory systems. How animals encode complex olfactory scenes to track the plume far from the source remains unclear. Here we focus on the coding of the plume temporal dynamics in moths. We compare responses of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) to sequences of pheromone stimuli either with white-noise patterns or with realistic turbulent temporal structures simulating a large range of distances (8 to 64 m) from the odor source. For the first time, we analyze what information is extracted by the olfactory system at large distances from the source. Neuronal responses are analyzed using linear-nonlinear models fitted with white-noise stimuli and used for predicting responses to turbulent stimuli. We found that neuronal firing rate is less correlated with the dynamic odor time course when distance to the source increases because of improper coding during long odor and no-odor events that characterize large distances. Rapid adaptation during long puffs does not preclude however the detection of puff transitions in PNs. Individual PNs but not individual ORNs encode the onset and offset of odor puffs for any temporal structure of stimuli. A higher spontaneous firing rate coupled to an inhibition phase at the end of PN responses contributes to this coding property. This allows PNs to decode the temporal structure of the odor plume at any distance to the source, an essential piece of information moths can use in their tracking behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.