Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29194429›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Hazard Ranking Method for Populations Exposed to Arsenic in Private Water Supplies: Relation to Bedrock Geology.

Helen Crabbe, Tony Fletcher, Rebecca Close, Michael J Watts, E Louise Ander, Pauline L Smedley, Neville Q Verlander, Martin Gregory, Daniel R S Middleton, David A Polya and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing Global Health through Environmental and Public Health Tracking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Helen CrabbeEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. helen.crabbe@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-5785
Tony FletcherEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. tony.fletcher@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3385-200X
Rebecca CloseEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. Rebecca.close@phe.gov.uk.
Michael J WattsInorganic Geochemistry, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, British Geological Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. mwatts@bgs.ac.uk.
E Louise AnderInorganic Geochemistry, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, British Geological Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. land@bgs.ac.uk.
Pauline L SmedleyInorganic Geochemistry, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, British Geological Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. pls@bgs.ac.uk.
Neville Q VerlanderStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, PHE, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK. neville.verlander@phe.gov.uk.
Martin GregoryCornwall Council, Environmental Protection Team, Public Health and Protection, Camborne, Cornwall TR14 8SX, UK. mgregory@cornwall.gov.uk.
Daniel R S MiddletonEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. middletond@fellows.iarc.fr.
David A PolyaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. david.polya@manchester.ac.uk.
Mike StuddenEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. michael.studden@gmail.com.
Giovanni S LeonardiEnvironmental Epidemiology Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK. giovanni.leonardi@phe.gov.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately one million people in the UK are served by private water supplies (PWS) where main municipal water supply system connection is not practical or where PWS is the preferred option. Chronic exposure to contaminants in PWS may have adverse effects on health. South West England is an area with elevated arsenic concentrations in groundwater and over 9000 domestic dwellings here are supplied by PWS. There remains uncertainty as to the extent of the population exposed to arsenic (As), and the factors predicting such exposure. We describe a hazard assessment model based on simplified geology with the potential to predict exposure to As in PWS. Households with a recorded PWS in Cornwall were recruited to take part in a water sampling programme from 2011 to 2013. Bedrock geologies were aggregated and classified into nine Simplified Bedrock Geological Categories (SBGC), plus a cross-cutting "mineralized" area. PWS were sampled by random selection within SBGCs and some 508 households volunteered for the study. Transformations of the data were explored to estimate the distribution of As concentrations for PWS by SBGC. Using the distribution per SBGC, we predict the proportion of dwellings that would be affected by high concentrations and rank the geologies according to hazard. Within most SBGCs, As concentrations were found to have log-normal distributions. Across these areas, the proportion of dwellings predicted to have drinking water over the prescribed concentration value (PCV) for As ranged from 0% to 20%. From these results, a pilot predictive model was developed calculating the proportion of PWS above the PCV for As and hazard ranking supports local decision making and prioritization. With further development and testing, this can help local authorities predict the number of dwellings that might fail the PCV for As, based on bedrock geology. The model presented here for Cornwall could be applied in areas with similar geologies. Application of the method requires independent validation and further groundwater-derived PWS sampling on other geological formations.

Indexed as

Water WellsArsenicDrinking WaterEnglandEnvironmental MonitoringGeologyGroundwaterHumansRisk AssessmentWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalarsenicenvironmental public health trackinggeologyhazard and exposure assessmentprivate water suppliespublic health risk

Identifiers

PMID29194429
PMCPMC5750908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.