Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29194212›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2018

Evaluation of Mitoquinone for Protecting Against Amikacin-Induced Ototoxicity in Guinea Pigs.

Carolyn O Dirain, Maria Raye Ann V Ng, Bailey Milne-Davies, Jerin K Joseph, Patrick J Antonelli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Role of Calcium Signaling in Sensorineural Hearing Loss.International journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Coenzyme Q10 Metabolism: A Review of Unresolved Issues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Identifying targets to prevent aminoglycoside ototoxicity.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn O DirainDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Maria Raye Ann V Ng
Bailey Milne-Davies
Jerin K Joseph
Patrick J Antonelli
University of Florida · US

Funding

MitoQ as novel agent for protecting against aminoglycoside ototoxicityR03DC013659 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DIRAIN, CAROLYN OJANO · 2014 to 2015
$299k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisMitoquinone (MitoQ) attenuates amikacin ototoxicity in guinea pigs.

backgroundMitoQ, a mitochondria-targeted derivative of the antioxidant ubiquinone, has improved bioavailability and demonstrated safety in humans. Thus, MitoQ is a promising therapeutic approach for protecting against amikacin-induced ototoxicity.

methodsBoth oral and subcutaneous administrations of MitoQ were tested. Amikacin-treated guinea pigs (n = 12-18 per group) received water alone (control) or MitoQ 30 mg/l-supplemented drinking water; or injected subcutaneously with 3 to 5 mg/kg MitoQ or saline (control). Auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were measured before MitoQ or control solution administration and after amikacin injections. Cochlear hair cell damage was assessed using scanning electron microscopy and Western blotting.

resultsWith oral administration, animals that received 30 mg/l MitoQ had better hearing than controls at only 24 kHz at 3-week (p = 0.017) and 6-week (p = 0.027) post-amikacin. With subcutaneous administration, MitoQ-injected guinea pigs had better hearing than controls at only 24 kHz, 2-week post-amikacin (p = 0.013). Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes were decreased after amikacin injections, but were not different between treatments (p > 0.05). Electron microscopy showed minor difference in outer hair cell loss between treatments. Western blotting demonstrated limited attenuation of oxidative stress in the cochlea of MitoQ-supplemented guinea pigs.

conclusionsOral or subcutaneous MitoQ provided limited protection against amikacin-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage in guinea pigs. Other strategies for attenuating aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity should be explored.

Indexed as

AmikacinAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGuinea PigsHair Cells, AuditoryHearingHearing LossOrganophosphorus CompoundsOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousUbiquinoneAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsmitoquinoneOrganophosphorus CompoundsUbiquinone

Identifiers

PMID29194212
PMCPMC5728173
OpenAlexW2769884895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.