Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29193905›Full record

ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2018

Circulating myomiRs: a new class of biomarkers to monitor skeletal muscle in physiology and medicine.

Julien Siracusa, Nathalie Koulmann, Sébastien Banzet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julien SiracusaInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, 1 place Valérie André, BP73, 91220, Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Nathalie KoulmannInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, 1 place Valérie André, BP73, 91220, Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Sébastien BanzetEcole du Val de Grâce, 1 place Alphonse Laveran, 75005, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small non-coding RNAs that target mRNAs and are consequently involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Some miRNAs are ubiquitously expressed in tissue, while others are tissue-specific or tissue-enriched. miRNAs can be released by cells and are found in various biofluids, including serum and plasma. Thus, measuring miRNAs in the circulation may provide information on the originating tissue or cells. MyomiRs are described as striated muscle-specific or muscle-enriched miRNAs. Their circulating levels can be measured and have been proposed to be new biomarkers of physiological and pathological muscle processes. The aims of this review are to summarize the current knowledge of circulating myomiRs, to identify the types of information they can provide about skeletal muscle, and to determine how to apply that information in the fields of research and medicine.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMedicineMicroRNAsMuscle, SkeletalBiomarkersMicroRNAsBiomarkerCirculating microRNAMicroRNAMyomiRsSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID29193905
PMCPMC5803618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.